Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: remove xblock-utils #434

Merged

Conversation

salman2013
Copy link
Contributor

@salman2013 salman2013 commented Nov 1, 2023

Description:

In this PR i removed xblock-utils and upgraded packages.

Ticket: https://github.com/orgs/openedx/projects/55/views/1?pane=issue&itemId=41364695

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 1, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (32716c6) 83.16% compared to head (e110c0f) 81.72%.
Report is 72 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #434      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.16%   81.72%   -1.45%     
==========================================
  Files          21       24       +3     
  Lines        1170     1302     +132     
==========================================
+ Hits          973     1064      +91     
- Misses        197      238      +41     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 81.72% <ø> (-1.45%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 21 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@salman2013 salman2013 changed the title chore: remove xblock utils chore: remove xblock-utils Nov 1, 2023
@salman2013 salman2013 marked this pull request as ready for review November 1, 2023 09:34
@salman2013 salman2013 requested a review from farhan November 2, 2023 04:11
@salman2013 salman2013 requested a review from feanil November 3, 2023 05:01
@feanil feanil merged commit 26ac4ed into openedx:master Nov 6, 2023
4 of 5 checks passed
@feanil feanil mentioned this pull request Nov 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants