feat: standardize make extract_translations

[shadinaif]

feat: standardize make extract_translations

This PR prepares the repository to comply with openedx-translations by doing the following:

• Delete bulk_grades/locale directory, and create a symbolic link from it to bulk_grades/conf/locale
• Fix the translation command make extract_translations to use django-admin instead of manage.py. And fix cd edx-bulk-grades to the correct path cd bulk_grades

• Tested on local devstack palm to ensure that everything renders fine
• Tested on local devstack palm to ensure that local translation still works there is no translation in this repo

References

This pull request is part of the FC-0012 project which is sparked by the Translation Infrastructure update OEP-58.

Check the links above for full information about the overall project.

Internalization is being rearchitected in Open edX Python, XBlock, Micro-frontend, and other projects. There are a number of immediately visible changes:

• Remove source and language translations from the repositories, hence no .json, .po or .mo files will be committed into the repos.
• Add standardized make extract_translations in all repositories
• Push user-facing messages strings into openedx/openedx-translations.
• Integrate root repositories with openedx/openedx-atlas to pull translations on build/deploy time

Breaking Changes

One of the primary goals of the project is to avoid breaking changes. If you noticed any suspicious code, please raise your concern. But before that, please know the strategy we're following to avoid breaking changes

For XBlocks:

• The standard translation path must be conf/locale. Therefore, we are creating a link from conf/locale to translations so Atlas can find the path without disrupting the current way of having translations locally within the XBlocks
• openedx-translations will have a related PR that adds the XBlock to the pipeline. This will not affect the current way of managing/updating translations
• At the end of the project, a clear change log will be added and all translations will be handled by Atlas. Thus, the local translation will be removed from the repo within the version bump
• A notification for the community will be published to ensure that everyone knows why translations directories are removed from all repos

[openedx-webhooks]

Thanks for the pull request, @shadinaif! Please note that it may take us up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

Feel free to add as much of the following information to the ticket as you can:

• supporting documentation
• Open edX discussion forum threads
• timeline information ("this must be merged by XX date", and why that is)
• partner information ("this is a course on edx.org")
• any other information that can help Product understand the context for the PR

All technical communication about the code itself will be done via the GitHub pull request interface. As a reminder, our process documentation is here.

Please let us know once your PR is ready for our review and all tests are green.

[shadinaif]

Ready for your review @OmarIthawi, @brian-smith-tcril

[OmarIthawi]

Is this only used for i18n_tools? I'm concerned that it will break other workflows.

What do you think?

[shadinaif]

@OmarIthawi I've noticed this pattern in many repos. 4-5 years ago, they were stripped out of edx-platform and had this structure as a common template. Many repos including this one, don't have a transifex project for it. So, the file is not actually used. make pull_translations doesn't find the translation anyway

We're removing all local translations soon, therefore, we can remove unused directories like this one now. Or should we always keep them until the last phase?

[OmarIthawi]

I'd err on the side of removing them. So it should be fine to do so.

[brian-smith-tcril]

@mphilbrick211 this one should be good to go! It's marked as "No extra review required" on the spreadsheet so it should just be a matter of getting a CC with perms on the repo to approve/merge.

[mphilbrick211]

Hi @mattcarter and @openedx/content-aurora! Would someone be able to merge this for us? Thanks!

[openedx-webhooks]

@shadinaif 🎉 Your pull request was merged! Please take a moment to answer a two question survey so we can improve your experience in the future.