Node resource table and modals

[dpanshug]

RHOAIENG-16256

Description

Added table and modal for Node resource for Hardware profile

How Has This Been Tested?

Currently this table and modal are standalone components and are not used anywhere, to tests you can import <ManageNodeResourceSection /> to any form page, like i have tested this in ManageAcceleratorProfile

Test Impact

Add unit tests for validation utility functions

Request review criteria:

Self checklist (all need to be checked):

• The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work
• Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
• The developer has added tests or explained why testing cannot be added (unit or cypress tests for related changes)

If you have UI changes:

• Included any necessary screenshots or gifs if it was a UI change.
• Included tags to the UX team if it was a UI/UX change.

After the PR is posted & before it merges:

• The developer has tested their solution on a cluster by using the image produced by the PR to main

@vconzola

[dpanshug]

WIP: needs some clarification around UX and data validation
discussing here: https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C07C0FNHVPT/p1733920395039179

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 22.13740% with 102 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 85.07%. Comparing base (5d3efb2) to head (6c59a81).
Report is 25 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...eProfiles/nodeResource/ManageNodeResourceModal.tsx	3.22%	30 Missing ⚠️
...s/hardwareProfiles/nodeResource/CountFormField.tsx	4.34%	22 Missing ⚠️
...hardwareProfiles/nodeResource/NodeResourceForm.tsx	4.54%	21 Missing ⚠️
...ardwareProfiles/nodeResource/NodeResourceTable.tsx	34.61%	17 Missing ⚠️
...ges/hardwareProfiles/ManageNodeResourceSection.tsx	0.00%	10 Missing ⚠️
...wareProfiles/nodeResource/NodeResourceTableRow.tsx	83.33%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3565      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.20%   85.07%   -0.14%     
==========================================
  Files        1381     1402      +21     
  Lines       31592    32174     +582     
  Branches     8832     9024     +192     
==========================================
+ Hits        26919    27371     +452     
- Misses       4673     4803     +130     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...d/src/pages/hardwareProfiles/nodeResource/const.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...d/src/pages/hardwareProfiles/nodeResource/utils.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...wareProfiles/nodeResource/NodeResourceTableRow.tsx	83.33% <83.33%> (ø)
...ges/hardwareProfiles/ManageNodeResourceSection.tsx	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ardwareProfiles/nodeResource/NodeResourceTable.tsx	34.61% <34.61%> (ø)
...hardwareProfiles/nodeResource/NodeResourceForm.tsx	4.54% <4.54%> (ø)
...s/hardwareProfiles/nodeResource/CountFormField.tsx	4.34% <4.34%> (ø)
...eProfiles/nodeResource/ManageNodeResourceModal.tsx	3.22% <3.22%> (ø)

... and 61 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 065da14...6c59a81. Read the comment docs.

[dpanshug]

@kaedward @vconzola i have updated the mocks, please review the error message for field validation.

[vconzola]

I believe there should be a space between the numbers and the units in the table, e.g., "1 GiB", not "1GiB", bur defer to @kaedward. Also, the units in the table should match the units in the dropdown, e.g., "GiB", not "Gi".

[Gkrumbach07]

Could you also update the other table node table to now use your view only table

[DaoDaoNoCode]

I think all the tables should use compact variant.

[DaoDaoNoCode]

@dpanshug Can you update the add button like we discussed above as well?

[Gkrumbach07]

/lgtm

[DaoDaoNoCode]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: DaoDaoNoCode, Gkrumbach07

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• frontend/OWNERS [Gkrumbach07]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment