[1.1] Fix runc run "permission denied" when rootless #3817
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
AkihiroSuda
approved these changes
Apr 7, 2023
mrunalp
approved these changes
Apr 7, 2023
Since commit 957d97b was made to fix issue [7], a few things happened: - a similar functionality appeared in go 1.20 [1], so the issue mentioned in the comment (being removed) is no longer true; - a bug in runc was found [2], which also affects go [3]; - the bug was fixed in go 1.21 [4] and 1.20.2 [5]; - a similar fix was made to x/sys/unix.Faccessat [6]. The essense of [2] is, even if a (non-root) user that the container is run as does not have execute permission bit set for the executable, it should still work in case runc has the CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE capability set. To fix this [2] without reintroducing the older bug [7]: - drop own Eaccess implementation; - use the one from x/sys/unix for Go 1.19 (depends on [6]); - do not use anything when Go 1.20+ is used. NOTE it is virtually impossible to fix the bug [2] when Go 1.20 or Go 1.20.1 is used because of [3]. A test case is added by a separate commit. Fixes: opencontainers#3715. [1] https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/414824 [2] opencontainers#3715 [3] https://go.dev/issue/58552 [4] https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/468735 [5] https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/469956 [6] https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/sys/+/468877 [7] opencontainers#3520 Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 8491d33) Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <[email protected]>
This is a test case for issue reported as opencontainers#3715. In short, even if a (non-root) user that the container is run as does not have execute permission bit set for the executable, it should still work in case runc has the CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE capability set. Note that since the upstream golang is also broken (see [1]), this test will fail for Go 1.20 and 1.20.1 (fix is in Go 1.20.2 as per [2]). [1] https://go.dev/issue/58552 [2] https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/469956 Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 8293ef2) Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <[email protected]>
This was referenced Apr 7, 2023
Closed
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a backport of #3753 to release-1.1 branch. Original description follows.
Fixes: #3715
Since PR #3522 (commit 957d97b) was made to fix issue #3520,
a few things happened:
mentioned in the comment (being removed) is no longer true;
The essense of the bug #3715 is, even if a (non-root) user that the container is
run as does not have execute permission bit set for the executable, it
should still work in case runc has the CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE capability set.
To fix #3715 without reintroducing the older bug [7]:
Add a test case to make sure we won't regress.
NOTE it is virtually impossible to fix the bug [2] when Go 1.20 or Go
1.20.1 is used because of [3].
[1] https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/414824
[2] #3715
[3] https://go.dev/issue/58552
[4] https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/468735
[5] https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/469956
[6] https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/sys/+/468877
[7] #3520