Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Follow up for #988. #1036

Conversation

carlosalberto
Copy link
Contributor

  • Fix CHANGELOG entry.
  • Use SHOULD for the tracestate change.
  • Add it to the compliance matrix.

Related to #988

Note: Realized we need to add the list of the built-in samplers to the compliance matrix, but will do that in another PR.

- Fix CHANGELOG entry.
- Use SHOULD for the tracestate change.
- Add it to the compliance matrix.
@@ -101,8 +101,8 @@ It produces an output called `SamplingResult` which contains:
object must be immutable (multiple calls may return different immutable objects).
* A `Tracestate` that will be associated with the `Span` through the new
`SpanContext`.
Note: If the sampler returns an empty `Tracestate` here, the `Tracestate` will be cleared,
so samplers should normally return the passed-in `Tracestate` if they do not intend
If the sampler returns an empty `Tracestate` here, the `Tracestate` will be cleared,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, but see also #1031

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But if we go that route, probably this entire section will be changed. Keeping it as a SHOULD instead of a MUST is a good situation for now ;)

spec-compliance-matrix.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Christian Neumüller <[email protected]>
@carlosalberto carlosalberto added the release:allowed-for-ga Editorial changes that can still be added before GA since they don't require action by SIGs label Sep 30, 2020
@carlosalberto
Copy link
Contributor Author

Merging this as it's a follow up to the (important) team #988

@carlosalberto carlosalberto merged commit 59fe1e7 into open-telemetry:master Sep 30, 2020
carlosalberto added a commit to carlosalberto/opentelemetry-specification that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release:allowed-for-ga Editorial changes that can still be added before GA since they don't require action by SIGs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants