Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Make the specification more flexible #175

Closed
rochdev opened this issue Jul 6, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Make the specification more flexible #175

rochdev opened this issue Jul 6, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@rochdev
Copy link
Member

rochdev commented Jul 6, 2019

Right now a very specific API is enforced that is Java-centric and makes for a very poor API in most languages. The specification should focus more on concepts that should be implemented and not specific classes and methods.

So far, almost every time a change was proposed in opentelemetry-js that would make the API a lot better and idiomatic for the user was rejected as it doesn't conform to the spec. This means that we are currently forced to implement an API that makes no sense for JavaScript.
@arminru
Copy link
Member

arminru commented Jul 8, 2019

+1
This was already brought up in #165, you might want to join the discussion there.

@rochdev
Copy link
Member Author

rochdev commented Jul 9, 2019

Thanks for pointing that out!

Closing in favor of #165

@rochdev rochdev closed this as completed Jul 9, 2019
TuckTuckFloof pushed a commit to TuckTuckFloof/opentelemetry-specification that referenced this issue Oct 15, 2020
@nholbrook
Sampler Performance Testing (open-telemetry#175)
5b8cd5b
carlosalberto pushed a commit to carlosalberto/opentelemetry-specification that referenced this issue Oct 21, 2024
@jmacd @carlosalberto
Probability sampler composition rules (open-telemetry#175)
c861c17
carlosalberto pushed a commit to carlosalberto/opentelemetry-specification that referenced this issue Oct 23, 2024
@jmacd
Probability sampler composition rules (open-telemetry#175)
71ad4eb
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@rochdev @arminru