You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There seems to be an inconsistency when deploying a target application, the Instrumentation opentelemetry.io/v1alpha1, and the Operator across different namespaces: auto-instrumentation might fail in some configurations. While the current documentation indicates support for such deployments, we need to clearly define which scenarios are supported and rectify any discrepancies.
For clarity, I've expanded and provided some e2e tests in a fork:
AC:
Instrumentation configurations from any namespace should seamlessly apply to a pod, irrespective of the namespace housing the target, Instrumentation opentelemetry.io/v1alpha1, and Operator.
These failures occur with manual testing as well. From an initial glance, it looks like the "namespace" value isn't handled properly when looking for the Instrumentation instance in the failing cases.
Hmmm. I actually can't reproduce this issue in recent versions of the Operator. Original I discovered this issue 6 months ago and it was reproducible. Closing this issue as fixed. Thanks @TylerHelmuth.
Description:
There seems to be an inconsistency when deploying a target application, the
Instrumentation opentelemetry.io/v1alpha1
, and the Operator across different namespaces: auto-instrumentation might fail in some configurations. While the current documentation indicates support for such deployments, we need to clearly define which scenarios are supported and rectify any discrepancies.For clarity, I've expanded and provided some e2e tests in a fork:
AC:
Instrumentation configurations from any namespace should seamlessly apply to a pod, irrespective of the namespace housing the target,
Instrumentation opentelemetry.io/v1alpha1
, and Operator.Related:
Lastly, I'd like to offer my assistance in addressing the failing scenarios with code changes or facilitating any related discussions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: