Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

otelzap: Split code attributes #6423

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 12, 2024
Merged

Conversation

pellared
Copy link
Member

@pellared pellared commented Dec 11, 2024

@pellared pellared requested a review from a team as a code owner December 11, 2024 07:30
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 67.8%. Comparing base (cb458f1) to head (e091d32).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main   #6423   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   67.8%   67.8%           
=====================================
  Files        200     200           
  Lines      16597   16605    +8     
=====================================
+ Hits       11259   11267    +8     
  Misses      4995    4995           
  Partials     343     343           
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
bridges/otelzap/core.go 97.9% <100.0%> (+0.1%) ⬆️

@pellared pellared requested a review from MrAlias as a code owner December 11, 2024 08:43
@pellared
Copy link
Member Author

@khushijain21, PTAL as a code owner.

@pellared pellared merged commit a71bdc8 into open-telemetry:main Dec 12, 2024
26 checks passed
@pellared pellared deleted the zap-code-split branch December 12, 2024 06:25
@MrAlias MrAlias added this to the v1.33.0 milestone Dec 12, 2024
MrAlias added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2024
### Added

- Added support for providing `endpoint`, `pollingIntervalMs` and
`initialSamplingRate` using environment variable
`OTEL_TRACES_SAMPLER_ARG` in
`go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/samples/jaegerremote`. (#6310)
- Added support exporting logs via OTLP over gRPC in
`go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/config`. (#6340)
- The `go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/bridges/otellogr` module.
This module provides an OpenTelemetry logging bridge for
`github.com/go-logr/logr`. (#6386)
- Added SNS instrumentation in
`go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/otelaws`.
(#6388)

### Changed

- Change the span name to be `GET /path` so it complies with the OTel
HTTP semantic conventions in
`go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/github.com/labstack/echo/otelecho`.
(#6365)
- Record errors instead of setting the `gin.errors` attribute in
`go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/github.com/gin-gonic/gin/otelgin`.
(#6346)
- The `go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/config` now supports multiple schemas
in subdirectories (i.e. `go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/config/v0.3.0`) for
easier migration. (#6412)

### Fixed

- Fix broken AWS presigned URLs when using instrumentation in
`go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/otelaws`.
(#5975)
- Fixed the value for configuring the OTLP exporter to use `grpc`
instead of `grpc/protobuf` in `go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/config`.
(#6338)
- Allow marshaling types in `go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/config`.
(#6347)
- Removed the redundant handling of panic from the `HTML` function in
`go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/github.com/gin-gonic/gin/otelgin`.
(#6373)
- The `code.function` attribute emitted by
`go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/bridges/otelslog` now stores just the
function name instead the package path-qualified function name. The
`code.namespace` attribute now stores the package path. (#6415)
- The `code.function` attribute emitted by
`go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/bridges/otelzap` now stores just the
function name instead the package path-qualified function name. The
`code.namespace` attribute now stores the package path. (#6423)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants