Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[sdk-metrics] Obsolete SetMaxMetricPointsPerMetricStream + standarize on "Cardinality Limit" name #5328
[sdk-metrics] Obsolete SetMaxMetricPointsPerMetricStream + standarize on "Cardinality Limit" name #5328
Changes from 17 commits
0e5c749
ce0afe2
5730d14
9bfe6cc
ae6d742
ea6aace
975b90e
d79ca7c
51674e6
8b91bf3
e3eb786
c2f8f88
4596cf1
bab53c9
856446f
6d05f7b
f3218a5
1b6c2a4
ae5c68d
73df3ec
695eb66
f1b62b0
9064b7a
454bd17
87d5875
5cfbf04
c24e42c
8a6d2c2
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@reyang I might have been too aggressive removing all of this. Do you still want it in there just showing the view instead of the global mechanism?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No strong opinion here. @utpilla might have different ideas.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@CodeBlanch We should keep the example here. People have found it useful to understand how configuring the cardinality would affect the export.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or combine.. removed in a future version, along with major version bump of the package.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not going to do this here because we use similar a bunch of places but good thing for a follow-up!