[chore] Add test to ensure metadata.yaml is present for all components #24643
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This PR uses the checkfile tool introduced in open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-build-tools#348 in order to validate the presence of the metadata.yaml file in all components. It also removes the checkdoc tool in favor of the checkfile tool, which is now also used to validate the presence of README.md. Issue: open-telemetry#23376
4 tasks
atoulme
approved these changes
Jul 27, 2023
songy23
added
the
ready to merge
3 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description:
This PR uses the checkfile tool introduced in open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-build-tools#348 in order to validate the presence of the metadata.yaml file in all components. It also removes the checkdoc tool in favor of the checkfile tool, which is now also used to validate the presence of README.md.
Link to tracking Issue:
#23376