Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[docs] Add status header for expvar receiver #10453

Conversation

Frapschen
Copy link
Contributor

Description:
Add status header for expvar receiver

@Frapschen Frapschen requested review from a team and mx-psi May 31, 2022 06:47
@Frapschen Frapschen changed the title Add status header for expvar receiver [docs] Add status header for expvar receiver May 31, 2022
@mx-psi
Copy link
Member

mx-psi commented May 31, 2022

@Frapschen it would help us if you ping the CODEOWNERS of each component on the PRs that you open, if that's not too much work?

@Frapschen
Copy link
Contributor Author

fine,by the way, where can I know the CODEOWNERS of a component.

@mx-psi mx-psi added the Skip Changelog PRs that do not require a CHANGELOG.md entry label May 31, 2022
@mx-psi
Copy link
Member

mx-psi commented May 31, 2022

fine,by the way, where can I know the CODEOWNERS of a component.

@Frapschen It's here: https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/blob/main/.github/CODEOWNERS

@Frapschen
Copy link
Contributor Author

fine,by the way, where can I know the CODEOWNERS of a component.

@Frapschen It's here: https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/blob/main/.github/CODEOWNERS

ok

@codeboten
Copy link
Contributor

This has been added in #10847

@codeboten codeboten closed this Jun 9, 2022
@Frapschen Frapschen deleted the Add_status_header_for_expvar_rc branch July 7, 2022 05:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Skip Changelog PRs that do not require a CHANGELOG.md entry
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants