-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[metricstransformprocessor] Support count
aggregation type for aggregate_labels
action
#24978
Comments
Pinging code owners: See Adding Labels via Comments if you do not have permissions to add labels yourself. |
/label processor/metricstransform I'm ready to prepare a PR after the triage. |
This issue has been inactive for 60 days. It will be closed in 60 days if there is no activity. To ping code owners by adding a component label, see Adding Labels via Comments, or if you are unsure of which component this issue relates to, please ping Pinging code owners:
See Adding Labels via Comments if you do not have permissions to add labels yourself. |
Hi @musaprg, feel free to submit a PR |
@dmitryax OK, thanks! Let me try preparing a PR. |
This issue has been inactive for 60 days. It will be closed in 60 days if there is no activity. To ping code owners by adding a component label, see Adding Labels via Comments, or if you are unsure of which component this issue relates to, please ping Pinging code owners:
See Adding Labels via Comments if you do not have permissions to add labels yourself. |
This issue has been inactive for 60 days. It will be closed in 60 days if there is no activity. To ping code owners by adding a component label, see Adding Labels via Comments, or if you are unsure of which component this issue relates to, please ping Pinging code owners:
See Adding Labels via Comments if you do not have permissions to add labels yourself. |
@musaprg Do you still plan on submitting a PR for this enhancement? |
This issue has been inactive for 60 days. It will be closed in 60 days if there is no activity. To ping code owners by adding a component label, see Adding Labels via Comments, or if you are unsure of which component this issue relates to, please ping Pinging code owners:
See Adding Labels via Comments if you do not have permissions to add labels yourself. |
Implemented here: |
Hey @crobert-1 and @dmitryax, would you mind taking a look at that PR? :) |
This issue has been inactive for 60 days. It will be closed in 60 days if there is no activity. To ping code owners by adding a component label, see Adding Labels via Comments, or if you are unsure of which component this issue relates to, please ping Pinging code owners:
See Adding Labels via Comments if you do not have permissions to add labels yourself. |
This feature seems to be now landed by #33442, so let me close this issue. Thanks @lopes-felipe! |
Component(s)
processor/metricstransform
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I'd like to substitute aggregation by
metricstransformprocessor
for some of our recording rules. It's performing very well, however, it currently doesn't support counting aggregated metrics up by specifiedlabel_set
, which is our blocker. It would be useful for users to support aggregation_typecount
inmetricstransformprocessor
.Describe the solution you'd like
I haven't looked into the code base yet, but a simple implementation would be returning the number of data points (
dps.Len()
) at a specific time.We could configure aggregation with the
count
type as:Describe alternatives you've considered
I don't have any other alternatives for now.
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: