-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 776
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: add --operation=mutation-controller flag #2542
fix: add --operation=mutation-controller flag #2542
Conversation
Signed-off-by: davis-haba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: davis-haba <[email protected]>
Codecov ReportBase: 53.41% // Head: 53.44% // Increases project coverage by
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2542 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 53.41% 53.44% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 120 120
Lines 10643 10634 -9
==========================================
- Hits 5685 5683 -2
+ Misses 4521 4514 -7
Partials 437 437
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this LGTM overall minus the question for AssignedOperations
?
rest are some nits and a UX improvement which can be punted/ non blocking
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you! LGTM
* Add --operation=mutation-controller flag Signed-off-by: davis-haba <[email protected]> * operations in sorted order Signed-off-by: davis-haba <[email protected]> * update mutation-controller op docs to indicate audit may also need the flag Signed-off-by: davis-haba <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: Sertaç Özercan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: davis-haba [email protected]
What this PR does / why we need it:
If one is using mutations with workload resource expansion, the deployment running the validating webhook will also need to run the mutation controller. The existing operations that run the mutation controller,
mutation-webhook
andmutation-status
, come with additional overhead that may not desirable.The PR adds a new operation for
mutation-controller
, that allows for enabling just the mutation controller without the mutation status or mutation webhook functionality.operations.md
doc page has been updated.