Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add computation_usage to transaction result response object #774

Conversation

illia-malachyn
Copy link
Contributor

Closes: #769

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 52.40%. Comparing base (c8d6c13) to head (403832d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #774      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   52.38%   52.40%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          35       35              
  Lines        5559     5562       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         2912     2915       +3     
  Misses       2261     2261              
  Partials      386      386              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 52.40% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@peterargue peterargue merged commit 62f6b8b into onflow:master Sep 26, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

TransactionResult type differs from protobuf schema
4 participants