Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve COA creation transaction to gracefully handle existing COA in storage #500

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 2, 2024

Conversation

m-Peter
Copy link
Collaborator

@m-Peter m-Peter commented Aug 30, 2024

Closes: #499

Description

This will allow us to distinguish the actual errors that might arise from the COA creation transaction, as until now we ignored the returned error.


For contributor use:

  • Targeted PR against master branch
  • Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the standards mentioned here.
  • Updated relevant documentation
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer
  • Added appropriate labels

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced transaction logic for creating Cadence-owned accounts, improving efficiency by preventing redundant operations.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling in the COA resource creation process, providing clearer error messages for better user feedback.
  • Documentation

    • Clarified storage path for Cadence-owned accounts to ensure proper referencing.

@m-Peter m-Peter added this to the Flow-EVM-M2 milestone Aug 30, 2024
@m-Peter m-Peter self-assigned this Aug 30, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 30, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce enhancements to the transaction logic for creating a Cadence-owned account, ensuring that if an account already exists for the signer, the process exits early to avoid unnecessary operations. Additionally, error handling in the requester service is improved by providing detailed error messages during the COA resource creation, enhancing robustness and clarity in error management.

Changes

Files Change Summary
services/requester/cadence/create_coa.cdc, services/requester/requester.go Improved transaction logic to check for existing COA accounts and enhanced error handling with detailed messages.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Improve COA creation transaction to handle existing COA resource in storage (#499)

🐰 "In the meadow where bunnies play,
A new COA shines bright today!
With checks in place, we hop with glee,
No more waste, just harmony!
Errors now clear, like a sunny ray,
Let's celebrate this fine new way!" 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
Early access features: disabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

  • Anthropic claude-3-5-sonnet for code reviews: Anthropic claims that the new Claude model has stronger code understanding and code generation capabilities than their previous models. Note: Our default code review model was also updated late last week. Please compare the quality of the reviews between the two models by toggling the early access feature.

Note:

  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.
  • Please join our Discord Community to provide feedback and report issues on the discussion post.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c50ffde and c5cd41f.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • services/requester/cadence/create_coa.cdc (1 hunks)
  • services/requester/requester.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
services/requester/cadence/create_coa.cdc (2)

13-16: Early exit logic is well-implemented.

The check for an existing Cadence-owned account and early exit if found is a good practice to avoid unnecessary operations.


26-29: Proper use of storage saving.

Saving the newly created account to storage is done correctly. The path and method used are appropriate for the operation.

services/requester/requester.go (1)

191-195: Enhanced error handling in COA creation.

The modifications to return detailed error messages instead of just logging them improve the robustness and clarity of the function. This change ensures that errors are properly communicated back to the caller, which is crucial for better error management.

Comment on lines +18 to +21
let vaultRef = self.auth.storage.borrow<auth(FungibleToken.Withdraw) &FlowToken.Vault>(
from: /storage/flowTokenVault
) ?? panic("Could not borrow reference to the owner's Vault!")
let vault <- vaultRef.withdraw(amount: amount) as! @FlowToken.Vault
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Potential risk with force unwrapping.

Using as! for unwrapping the vault withdrawal could lead to a runtime panic if the cast fails. Consider handling this scenario more gracefully to improve error resilience.

Suggest using a safer casting method or adding error handling around this operation.

Copy link
Contributor

@sideninja sideninja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very nice idea to handle that in tx

@sideninja sideninja merged commit e74a62d into main Sep 2, 2024
2 checks passed
@m-Peter m-Peter deleted the improve-coa-creation-transaction branch September 5, 2024 08:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: ✅ Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improve COA creation transaction to handle existing COA resource in storage
2 participants