Fix lint errors

[SupunS]

There is a lint error introduced by #1505, which I didn't notice (I think CI wasn't running/ wasn't showing it).

This fixes the lint error.

---

• Targeted PR against master branch
• Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work
• Code follows the standards mentioned here
• Updated relevant documentation
• Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer
• Added appropriate labels

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1509 (96eff82) into feature/memory-metering (d6c4694) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@                     Coverage Diff                     @@
##           feature/memory-metering    #1509      +/-   ##
===========================================================
- Coverage                    75.39%   75.39%   -0.01%     
===========================================================
  Files                          292      292              
  Lines                        57426    57426              
===========================================================
- Hits                         43297    43295       -2     
- Misses                       12624    12626       +2     
  Partials                      1505     1505              

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	75.39% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
runtime/interpreter/interpreter.go	88.93% <100.00%> (ø)
runtime/sema/simple_type.go	92.30% <0.00%> (-3.85%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d6c4694...96eff82. Read the comment docs.

[dsainati1]

Thanks

[github-actions]

Cadence Benchstat comparison

This branch with compared with the base branch onflow:feature/memory-metering commit d6c4694
The command for i in {1..N}; do go test ./... -run=XXX -bench=. -shuffle=on; done was used.
Bench tests were run a total of 7 times on each branch.

Results

	old.txt	new.txt
	time/op		delta
RuntimeResourceDictionaryValues-2	16.9ms ± 6%	16.6ms ± 2%	~	(p=0.383 n=7+7)
RuntimeFungibleTokenTransfer-2	1.42ms ±27%	1.44ms ±23%	~	(p=0.456 n=7+7)
ParseDeploy/byte_array-2	27.3ms ±10%	26.5ms ± 3%	~	(p=0.234 n=7+6)
ParseDeploy/decode_hex-2	1.39ms ± 2%	1.41ms ± 3%	~	(p=0.383 n=7+7)
ParseInfix-2	9.91µs ± 2%	9.95µs ± 5%	~	(p=0.902 n=7+7)
ParseArray-2	16.8ms ± 6%	16.3ms ± 6%	~	(p=0.259 n=7+7)
ParseFungibleToken-2	221µs ± 3%	219µs ± 2%	~	(p=0.535 n=7+7)
QualifiedIdentifierCreation/One_level-2	3.17ns ± 2%	3.20ns ± 2%	~	(p=0.274 n=7+7)
QualifiedIdentifierCreation/Three_levels-2	162ns ± 3%	160ns ± 2%	~	(p=0.330 n=7+7)
ContractInterfaceFungibleToken-2	46.9µs ± 2%	47.0µs ± 3%	~	(p=0.534 n=6+7)
CheckContractInterfaceFungibleTokenConformance-2	159µs ± 6%	157µs ± 4%	~	(p=0.383 n=7+7)
NewInterpreter/new_interpreter-2	1.34µs ± 2%	1.35µs ± 4%	~	(p=0.274 n=7+7)
NewInterpreter/new_sub-interpreter-2	2.70µs ± 2%	2.74µs ± 3%	~	(p=0.165 n=7+7)
InterpretRecursionFib-2	3.19ms ± 7%	3.20ms ± 4%	~	(p=0.620 n=7+7)
	alloc/op		delta
RuntimeResourceDictionaryValues-2	4.05MB ± 0%	4.05MB ± 0%	~	(p=0.831 n=7+7)
RuntimeFungibleTokenTransfer-2	274kB ± 0%	274kB ± 0%	~	(p=0.902 n=7+7)
QualifiedIdentifierCreation/One_level-2	0.00B	0.00B	~	(all equal)
QualifiedIdentifierCreation/Three_levels-2	64.0B ± 0%	64.0B ± 0%	~	(all equal)
ContractInterfaceFungibleToken-2	26.6kB ± 0%	26.6kB ± 0%	~	(all equal)
CheckContractInterfaceFungibleTokenConformance-2	66.2kB ± 0%	66.2kB ± 0%	~	(all equal)
NewInterpreter/new_interpreter-2	848B ± 0%	848B ± 0%	~	(all equal)
NewInterpreter/new_sub-interpreter-2	1.36kB ± 0%	1.36kB ± 0%	~	(all equal)
InterpretRecursionFib-2	1.26MB ± 0%	1.26MB ± 0%	~	(p=0.538 n=6+7)
	allocs/op		delta
RuntimeResourceDictionaryValues-2	102k ± 0%	102k ± 0%	~	(p=0.740 n=7+7)
RuntimeFungibleTokenTransfer-2	4.54k ± 0%	4.54k ± 0%	~	(p=1.000 n=7+7)
QualifiedIdentifierCreation/One_level-2	0.00	0.00	~	(all equal)
QualifiedIdentifierCreation/Three_levels-2	2.00 ± 0%	2.00 ± 0%	~	(all equal)
ContractInterfaceFungibleToken-2	458 ± 0%	458 ± 0%	~	(all equal)
CheckContractInterfaceFungibleTokenConformance-2	1.07k ± 0%	1.07k ± 0%	~	(all equal)
NewInterpreter/new_interpreter-2	13.0 ± 0%	13.0 ± 0%	~	(all equal)
NewInterpreter/new_sub-interpreter-2	41.0 ± 0%	41.0 ± 0%	~	(all equal)
InterpretRecursionFib-2	26.2k ± 0%	26.2k ± 0%	~	(all equal)