Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

json terminology #66

Open
constantinpape opened this issue Oct 18, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

json terminology #66

constantinpape opened this issue Oct 18, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@constantinpape
Copy link
Contributor

Do we have a fixed convention for how to use json terminology in the spec?
For object ({}) I think we are currently using dictionary. And for array ([]) we are using list.
I.e. we are using the names of the equivalent python data structures. I think this is fine (esp. since we don't want to use array due to the overloaded meaning in the zarr spec), but it should be stated somewhere in the preamble of the spec.
@will-moore
Copy link
Member

This is similar to #70 and could go in the same section.

@constantinpape constantinpape mentioned this issue Feb 16, 2022
Open
9 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@will-moore @constantinpape