-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 625
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix autocomplete unable to pre-fill in certain usages; Adds utility fn. to merge autocomplete options; Fixes facility select in resource form edge case #10646
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new utility function Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant RF as ResourceForm
participant UT as mergeAutocompleteOptions (utils.ts)
participant AC as Autocomplete Component
participant U as User
RF->>UT: Call mergeAutocompleteOptions(facilityOptions, selectedValue)
UT-->>RF: Return mergedOptions
RF->>AC: Pass mergedOptions to Autocomplete
AC->>U: Display options ("label - value")
U->>AC: Select an option
AC-->>U: Return selected option
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for care-ohc ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/components/ui/autocomplete.tsx (1)
72-76
: Consider using a more efficient value handling approach.The current implementation combines and then splits the label and value, which is inefficient. Consider passing the option object directly to maintain the relationship between label and value without string manipulation.
-value={`${option.label} - ${option.value}`} -onSelect={(v) => { - const currentValue = - options.find((o) => `${o.label} - ${o.value}` === v)?.value || - ""; +value={option.value} +onSelect={(v) => { + const currentValue = v || "";
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/Utils/utils.ts
(1 hunks)src/components/Resource/ResourceForm.tsx
(2 hunks)src/components/ui/autocomplete.tsx
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: cypress-run (1)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/Utils/utils.ts (1)
245-252
: LGTM!The utility function is well-implemented with proper handling of edge cases and duplicate prevention.
src/components/Resource/ResourceForm.tsx (1)
278-286
: LGTM!The integration of
mergeAutocompleteOptions
effectively solves the pre-fill issue by ensuring the selected facility is included in the options.
LGTM |
@nihal467 @rithviknishad Cypress tests are failing, is this expected? |
@rithviknishad Your efforts have helped advance digital healthcare and TeleICU systems. 🚀 Thank you for taking the time out to make CARE better. We hope you continue to innovate and contribute; your impact is immense! 🙌 |
Proposed Changes
value
. Eg. all usages of Geo Organization Selector@ohcnetwork/care-fe-code-reviewers
Merge Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit