Add Real-Time Validation for CreateUserForm and Standardize UI Across Forms
#10054
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@AdityaJ2305 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 9 minutes and 38 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a comprehensive enhancement to user validation mechanisms across multiple components. The changes focus on improving real-time validation feedback for username and password fields by implementing a new Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for care-ohc ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/components/Users/UserFormValidations.tsx (1)
16-20: Consider enhancing accessibility and user experience.While the implementation is solid, consider these improvements:
- Add
role="status"to the validation messages container for better screen reader support- Consider adding a visual transition when validation states change
Apply this diff:
return ( - <div> + <div role="status"> {isInputEmpty && validations.map((validation, index) => ( - <div key={index} className="text-gray-500 mb-2 text-sm"> + <div key={index} className="text-gray-500 mb-2 text-sm transition-all duration-200">Also applies to: 21-57
src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx (2)
328-349: Consider adding password strength indicator.While the validation feedback is comprehensive, a visual password strength meter would enhance user experience.
Would you like me to provide an implementation for a password strength indicator component?
108-109: Consider consolidating focus state management.With multiple focus states, consider using a reducer or custom hook to manage form field focus states.
Would you like me to provide an implementation for a custom focus management hook?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
public/locale/en.json(3 hunks)src/components/Auth/ResetPassword.tsx(3 hunks)src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx(6 hunks)src/components/Users/UserFormValidations.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Users/UserResetPassword.tsx(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: cypress-run (1)
- GitHub Check: OSSAR-Scan
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/components/Users/UserFormValidations.tsx (1)
11-14: LGTM! Well-structured type definition.The
Validationtype clearly defines the contract for validation rules with description and fulfillment status.src/components/Auth/ResetPassword.tsx (1)
133-159: Ensure validation rules match the schema validation.The validation rules in the UI should match the validation schema in
validateData. Consider extracting these validation rules to a shared constant to maintain consistency.Run this script to verify validation consistency:
✅ Verification successful
Validation rules are consistent but could be centralized
The password validation rules in the UI match exactly with both the schema validation and the central validation function. However, consider extracting these rules to a shared constant to avoid duplication and make future updates easier to maintain.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for password validation rules across the codebase rg -A 5 "validatePassword|password.*validation"Length of output: 10685
src/components/Users/UserResetPassword.tsx (1)
155-181: LGTM! Comprehensive password validation with old password check.The implementation includes all standard password requirements plus an additional check to ensure the new password differs from the old one.
public/locale/en.json (3)
1355-1355: Password validation messages look good!The password validation messages have been properly formatted with HTML emphasis tags, providing clear visual hierarchy and improved readability for users.
Also applies to: 1490-1491, 1493-1493, 1498-1498, 1501-1501
2148-2150: Username validation messages are well structured!The username validation messages follow the same formatting pattern as password validations, using HTML emphasis tags consistently. The messages are clear and descriptive.
Also applies to: 2153-2154
1355-1355: Verify HTML sanitization for validation messages.Since the messages contain HTML tags, ensure that the application properly sanitizes these strings when rendering to prevent XSS vulnerabilities.
Also applies to: 1490-1491, 1493-1493, 1498-1498, 1501-1501, 2148-2150, 2153-2154
✅ Verification successful
Validation messages are rendered securely through React's text escaping
The validation messages containing HTML tags are rendered securely because:
- React automatically escapes HTML in text content by default
- The FormMessage component converts messages to plain text using String()
- No dangerouslySetInnerHTML is used for validation message rendering
The i18next configuration with
escapeValue: falseis necessary for HTML tags in translations but doesn't create security vulnerabilities as the messages are rendered through React's secure text rendering mechanism.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if HTML sanitization is implemented for validation messages # Look for HTML sanitization in the codebase rg -A 5 "sanitize|escape|xss|dangerouslySetInnerHTML" # Look for validation message rendering ast-grep --pattern 'render($$$validation_message$$$)'Length of output: 15357
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for validation message rendering and i18n usage patterns rg -A 3 "useTranslation|t\(|Trans" src/ # Look for validation-related components and hooks fd -e tsx -e ts "validation|error|message" src/Length of output: 77795
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for validation message rendering patterns rg -A 3 "ValidationMessage|FormMessage|ErrorMessage|t\(.*error|t\(.*validation" src/ # Look for form validation components fd -e tsx -e ts "form|validation" src/components/Length of output: 49223
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for shadcn/ui form component implementation and HTML sanitization rg -A 5 "FormMessage.*=.*|dangerouslySetInnerHTML.*=.*" src/components/ui/form.tsx # Check if there's any HTML parsing/sanitization in the form components rg -A 3 "html|sanitize|parse|DOMPurify" src/components/ui/Length of output: 2310
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx (3)
331-348: Enhance password security requirements.Consider adding these additional password security validations:
- Special character requirement
- Maximum length limit
- Common password check
Apply this diff to add special character validation:
validations={[ // ... existing validations ... + { + description: "password_special_char_validation", + fulfilled: /[!@#$%^&*(),.?":{}|<>]/.test(field.value), + }, ]}
271-273: Enhance accessibility for validation feedback.The
aria-liveimplementation is good, but consider these improvements:
- Add
role="status"to validation message containers- Use
aria-invalidon input fields when validation failsAlso applies to: 325-327
Line range hint
401-421: Consider supporting international phone numbers.The current implementation is limited to Indian phone numbers (+91). Consider:
- Using a phone number validation library (e.g.,
libphonenumber-js)- Adding country code selection
- Supporting various phone number formats
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
public/locale/en.json(3 hunks)src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx(6 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- public/locale/en.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: cypress-run (1)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx (1)
3-3: LGTM! Clean implementation of focus state management.The addition of focus state management using React hooks is well-structured and follows best practices.
Also applies to: 31-34, 108-109
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
cypress/pageObject/Users/UserCreation.ts (3)
38-42: Consider removingforce: trueand adding proper wait conditions.While the addition of existence and visibility checks improves reliability, using
force: truecould mask real issues. Consider:
- Removing
force: trueand properly handling actionability- Adding timeout options for flaky scenarios
- Adding disabled state checks
cy.get('[data-cy="username-input"]') .should("exist") .should("be.visible") + .should("be.enabled") .clear() - .type(username, { force: true }); + .type(username, { timeout: 10000 });
47-51: Remove redundant inline comments.The current comments simply describe what the code is doing, which is already clear from the code itself. Comments should explain "why" not "what".
cy.get('[data-cy="password-input"]') - .should("exist") // Ensure the field exists - .should("be.visible") // Ensure the field is visible - .clear() // Clear the field before typing - .type(password, { force: true }); // Type the password + .should("exist") + .should("be.visible") + .clear() + .type(password, { force: true });
38-42: Extract common input field handling pattern.Both
fillUsernameandfillPasswordshare the same pattern. Consider extracting this to a helper method to follow DRY principles and ensure consistent behavior.private fillField(selector: string, value: string) { return cy.get(selector) .should("exist") .should("be.visible") .should("be.enabled") .clear() .type(value, { timeout: 10000 }); } fillUsername(username: string) { this.fillField('[data-cy="username-input"]', username); return this; } fillPassword(password: string) { this.fillField('[data-cy="password-input"]', password); return this; }Also applies to: 47-51
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
cypress/pageObject/Users/UserCreation.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
cypress/pageObject/Users/UserCreation.ts (1)
Learnt from: AnveshNalimela
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#8930
File: cypress/pageobject/Users/UserCreation.ts:31-42
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:23:10.322Z
Learning: In `UserCreationPage` of `UserCreation.ts`, methods like `typePhoneNumber` and `typeUserPhoneNumber` target different input fields and are both necessary.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: cypress-run (1)
- GitHub Check: OSSAR-Scan
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
package.json(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Test
- GitHub Check: CodeQL-Build
- GitHub Check: cypress-run (1)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
package.json (1)
30-30: Security consideration: Exposing dev server to network access.The
--hostflag makes the development server accessible from other devices on the network. This could potentially expose sensitive information or debugging tools. Please ensure:
- This is an intentional change with a documented use case
- Proper security controls are in place
- The development environment is properly configured
✅ Verification successful
The
--hostflag usage is verified for development purposesThis is an intentional configuration required for local development, cross-device testing, and BrowserStack integration as documented in the project. The codebase has appropriate security controls in place including code scanning, OSSAR analysis, and automated testing workflows.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are any security guidelines or documentation about exposing dev servers fd -t f "README|SECURITY|CONTRIBUTING" -X cat {} 2>/dev/nullLength of output: 20259
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
cypress/pageObject/Users/UserCreation.ts (1)
Update test validation messages to match current phone number validation rules
The validation messages in the test are outdated. The current implementation supports multiple phone number formats with specific rules:
- Indian mobile numbers must start with +91 followed by 10 digits (first digit 6-9)
- International numbers, landline numbers, and support numbers have different formats
Please update the phone number validation messages in
verifyValidationErrors()to accurately reflect these requirements.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
63-81: Verify validation messages match the new real-time validation.Since this PR implements new real-time validation with updated messages, please ensure that the validation messages in
verifyValidationErrorsmatch the new messages implemented in theValidationHelpercomponent.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Compare validation messages in test with actual implementation # Find validation messages in ValidationHelper component echo "Validation messages in ValidationHelper:" rg -A 5 "validation.*message" "src/components/Users/UserFormValidations.tsx" # Find validation message translations echo "Validation message translations:" rg -A 5 "validation.*message" "public/locale/en.json"Length of output: 296
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find validation and form-related files echo "Looking for validation and form-related files:" fd -t f -e ts -e tsx -e json . | grep -i "valid\|form\|user" # Search for validation messages with broader patterns echo -e "\nSearching for validation patterns:" rg -i "required|validation|message" --type ts --type tsx -A 3 # Search specifically for phone validation patterns echo -e "\nSearching for phone validation patterns:" rg -i "phone.*validation|phone.*message" --type ts --type tsx -A 3Length of output: 3235
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check validation messages in specific files echo "Checking UserFormValidations.tsx:" cat "src/components/Users/UserFormValidations.tsx" || true echo -e "\nChecking validation.tsx:" cat "src/common/validation.tsx" || true echo -e "\nChecking FieldValidators.tsx:" cat "src/components/Form/FieldValidators.tsx" || true # Search with correct typescript file type echo -e "\nSearching for phone validation patterns:" rg -t typescript -t tsx "phone.*validation|phone.*message" || trueLength of output: 5635
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
cypress/pageObject/Users/UserCreation.ts (1)
38-39: Remove commented code and document the reason for using direct Cypress commands.
- Remove the commented line as it adds noise to the codebase.
- Consider adding a comment explaining why direct Cypress commands are preferred over
typeIntoFieldfor real-time validation testing.- // cy.typeIntoField('[data-cy="username-input"]', username); cy.get('[data-cy="username-input"]').click().type(username);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
cypress/pageObject/Users/UserCreation.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
cypress/pageObject/Users/UserCreation.ts (1)
Learnt from: AnveshNalimela
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#8930
File: cypress/pageobject/Users/UserCreation.ts:31-42
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:23:10.322Z
Learning: In `UserCreationPage` of `UserCreation.ts`, methods like `typePhoneNumber` and `typeUserPhoneNumber` target different input fields and are both necessary.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: cypress-run (1)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
cypress/pageObject/Users/UserCreation.ts (1)
44-44: LGTM! Consistent implementation with username field.The implementation follows the same pattern as the username field, which is good for maintainability and aligns with the PR's goal of standardizing UI interactions.
|
@coderabbitai, getting this error in cypress |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. @AdityaJ2305 The error occurs because Cypress can't find the password input element within its default timeout of 10 seconds. This could happen if the form takes longer to render. Try modifying the fillPassword(password: string) {
cy.get('[data-cy="password-input"]', { timeout: 15000 })
.should("be.visible")
.type(password, { force: true });
return this;
}This gives the component more time to render before Cypress attempts to interact with it. Let me know if you still face any issues. 🔗 Analysis chain🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: Length of output: 325 Script: Length of output: 19492 Script: Length of output: 5054 ✏️ Learnings added
|
|
@coderabbitai, it is failing again for the same reason |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. @AdityaJ2305 Let's try increasing the timeout further and add an explicit wait for visibility. Update the fillPassword(password: string) {
cy.get('[data-cy="password-input"]', { timeout: 30000 })
.should('exist')
.should('be.visible')
.type(password, { force: true });
return this;
}This change:
The longer timeout and additional checks should help handle the delays caused by the complex form initialization and validation setup. Let me know if you still face any issues. 🔗 Analysis chain🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: Length of output: 5150 Script: Length of output: 19682 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx (1)
140-140:⚠️ Potential issueEnhance username validation patterns for better security.
While the real-time validation implementation looks good, the regex patterns for username validation should be anchored with
^and$to prevent partial matches.Apply this diff to fix the patterns:
{ description: "username_characters_validation", - fulfilled: /^[a-z0-9._-]*$/.test(field.value), + fulfilled: /^[a-z0-9._-]+$/.test(field.value), }, { description: "username_consecutive_validation", - fulfilled: !/(?:[._-]{2,})/.test(field.value), + fulfilled: !/^.*[._-]{2,}.*$/.test(field.value), },Also applies to: 264-301
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx (3)
319-351: Consider adding password complexity score indicator.The password validation implementation is solid, but consider enhancing user experience by adding a password strength indicator.
Example implementation:
const getPasswordStrength = (password: string): number => { let score = 0; if (password.length >= 8) score++; if (/[a-z]/.test(password)) score++; if (/[A-Z]/.test(password)) score++; if (/\d/.test(password)) score++; if (/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(password)) score++; return score; };Then add a visual indicator below the ValidationHelper:
<div className="mt-2"> <div className="h-1 grid grid-cols-5 gap-1"> {Array.from({ length: 5 }).map((_, i) => ( <div key={i} className={`h-full rounded ${ i < getPasswordStrength(field.value) ? 'bg-green-500' : 'bg-gray-200' }`} /> ))} </div> </div>
264-265: Ensure proper cleanup of focus states.Consider using the
useCallbackhook for focus/blur handlers and cleanup on component unmount.const handleFieldFocus = useCallback((setter: (value: boolean) => void) => { return () => setter(true); }, []); const handleFieldBlur = useCallback((setter: (value: boolean) => void) => { return () => setter(false); }, []); useEffect(() => { return () => { setIsPasswordFieldFocused(false); setIsUsernameFieldFocused(false); }; }, []);Also applies to: 319-320
269-301: Consider extracting validation configuration.The validation rules could be extracted into a separate configuration file for better maintainability.
Create a new file
src/components/Users/validationConfig.ts:export const usernameValidations = [ { description: "username_min_length_validation", validate: (value: string) => value.length >= 4, }, // ... other username validations ]; export const passwordValidations = [ { description: "password_length_validation", validate: (value: string) => value.length >= 8, }, // ... other password validations ];Also applies to: 323-351
src/components/Users/UserResetPassword.tsx (2)
150-181: Well-structured validation implementation with real-time feedback! 👍Great implementation with:
- Clear validation criteria
- Accessible feedback using
aria-live- Real-time validation on focus
However, consider these improvements:
- Type-safe translation keys
- Success message timing
Consider this enhancement for type-safe translations:
// Create a type-safe translation key enum enum PasswordValidationKeys { LENGTH = "password_length_validation", LOWERCASE = "password_lowercase_validation", // ... other keys } // Use in validations array validations={[ { description: PasswordValidationKeys.LENGTH, fulfilled: field.value.length >= 8, }, // ... other validations ]}Also, consider showing the success message only when both password fields match:
successMessage={ field.value === form.watch("new_password_2") ? t("password_success_message") : undefined }
150-154: Enhance accessibility for validation messages.While the
aria-liveattribute is good, consider adding more descriptive ARIA labels for screen readers.Consider these accessibility improvements:
<div className="text-small mt-2 pl-2 text-secondary-500" aria-live="polite" + role="status" + aria-label={t("password_requirements")} >
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
public/locale/en.json(3 hunks)src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx(6 hunks)src/components/Users/UserResetPassword.tsx(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- public/locale/en.json
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx (3)
Learnt from: AdityaJ2305
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#10054
File: src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx:278-297
Timestamp: 2025-01-19T15:10:57.217Z
Learning: When implementing Cypress tests for forms with real-time validation and focus/blur handlers, avoid typing character-by-character with click() events as it can cause multiple re-renders. Instead, type the entire string at once after ensuring the input is visible.
Learnt from: AdityaJ2305
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#10054
File: src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx:278-297
Timestamp: 2025-01-19T14:12:10.781Z
Learning: When using Cypress with React forms that have real-time validation, use `should('be.visible')` before typing and add `{ force: true }` option or break down type commands into smaller chunks with intermediate assertions to handle DOM detachment issues.
Learnt from: AdityaJ2305
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#10054
File: src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx:278-297
Timestamp: 2025-01-19T14:53:36.552Z
Learning: In Cypress tests for React forms, avoid triggering validation errors by submitting an incomplete form before filling all fields, as this can cause form re-rendering and make elements temporarily unavailable to Cypress. Instead, fill all required fields first and then submit the form.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: cypress-run (1)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx (1)
108-109: LGTM! Clean state management implementation.The state variables for tracking field focus are well-named and follow React's useState conventions.
src/components/Users/UserResetPassword.tsx (1)
22-22: Verify the ValidationHelper component's availability.The transition from
validateRuletoValidationHelperrepresents a breaking change.Let's verify the component's existence and implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Import of ValidationHelper is correctly implemented
The ValidationHelper component exists in the correct location and provides the necessary password validation functionality with proper UI feedback.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if ValidationHelper exists and verify its implementation ast-grep --pattern 'export const ValidationHelper = $_' || \ ast-grep --pattern 'export function ValidationHelper($_)'Length of output: 2885
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx (2)
264-304: Consider debouncing the username availability check.While the real-time validation implementation looks good, the username availability check might trigger too frequently during typing. Consider adding a debounce to prevent unnecessary API calls.
const { isLoading: isUsernameChecking, isError: isUsernameTaken } = useQuery({ queryKey: ["checkUsername", usernameInput], + staleTime: 1000, // Add stale time to prevent frequent refetches + enabled: !form.formState.errors.username && usernameInput.length >= 4, - enabled: !form.formState.errors.username, queryFn: query(userApi.checkUsername, { pathParams: { username: usernameInput }, silent: true, }), });
321-353: Add aria-label for password validation feedback.The password validation feedback is well-implemented, but consider adding an aria-label to improve accessibility.
<div className="text-small mt-2 pl-2 text-secondary-500" aria-live="polite" + aria-label={t("password_validation_requirements")} >
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
public/locale/en.json(3 hunks)src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx(6 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- public/locale/en.json
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx (3)
Learnt from: AdityaJ2305
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#10054
File: src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx:278-297
Timestamp: 2025-01-19T15:10:57.217Z
Learning: When implementing Cypress tests for forms with real-time validation and focus/blur handlers, avoid typing character-by-character with click() events as it can cause multiple re-renders. Instead, type the entire string at once after ensuring the input is visible.
Learnt from: AdityaJ2305
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#10054
File: src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx:278-297
Timestamp: 2025-01-19T14:12:10.781Z
Learning: When using Cypress with React forms that have real-time validation, use `should('be.visible')` before typing and add `{ force: true }` option or break down type commands into smaller chunks with intermediate assertions to handle DOM detachment issues.
Learnt from: AdityaJ2305
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#10054
File: src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx:278-297
Timestamp: 2025-01-19T14:53:36.552Z
Learning: In Cypress tests for React forms, avoid triggering validation errors by submitting an incomplete form before filling all fields, as this can cause form re-rendering and make elements temporarily unavailable to Cypress. Instead, fill all required fields first and then submit the form.
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx (3)
108-109: LGTM! Clean state management implementation.The focus state management is well-implemented using separate state variables for username and password fields, following React best practices.
278-297: Enhance security of username validation patterns.The regex patterns for username validation should be anchored with
^and$to prevent partial matches. This is particularly important for security-critical validation rules.
Line range hint
1-585: Address Cypress test failures with real-time validation.Based on the retrieved learnings, the real-time validation changes are causing Cypress test failures. The test failures are occurring due to DOM detachment during typing operations.
Follow these guidelines to fix the test failures:
- Use
should('be.visible')before typing- Add
{ force: true }option to type commands- Break down type commands into smaller chunks with intermediate assertions
- Avoid triggering validation errors by submitting an incomplete form
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx (1)
284-303:⚠️ Potential issueEnhance security of username validation patterns.
The regex patterns for username validation should be anchored with
^and$to prevent partial matches. This is particularly important for security-critical validation rules.Apply this diff:
{ description: "username_characters_validation", - fulfilled: /^[a-z0-9._-]*$/.test(field.value), + fulfilled: /^[a-z0-9._-]*$/.test(field.value), }, { description: "username_consecutive_validation", - fulfilled: !/(?:[._-]{2,})/.test(field.value), + fulfilled: !/^.*[._-]{2,}.*$/.test(field.value), },
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx (1)
331-359: Well-structured password validation implementation.Good implementation of:
- Comprehensive password requirements
- Real-time validation feedback
- Accessible error messages
However, consider adding a password strength indicator to enhance user experience.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx(6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx (3)
Learnt from: AdityaJ2305
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#10054
File: src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx:278-297
Timestamp: 2025-01-19T15:10:57.217Z
Learning: When implementing Cypress tests for forms with real-time validation and focus/blur handlers, avoid typing character-by-character with click() events as it can cause multiple re-renders. Instead, type the entire string at once after ensuring the input is visible.
Learnt from: AdityaJ2305
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#10054
File: src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx:278-297
Timestamp: 2025-01-19T14:12:10.781Z
Learning: When using Cypress with React forms that have real-time validation, use `should('be.visible')` before typing and add `{ force: true }` option or break down type commands into smaller chunks with intermediate assertions to handle DOM detachment issues.
Learnt from: AdityaJ2305
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#10054
File: src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx:278-297
Timestamp: 2025-01-19T14:53:36.552Z
Learning: In Cypress tests for React forms, avoid triggering validation errors by submitting an incomplete form before filling all fields, as this can cause form re-rendering and make elements temporarily unavailable to Cypress. Instead, fill all required fields first and then submit the form.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: cypress-run (1)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx (3)
101-106: Initialize form fields with empty strings.Good practice to initialize all form fields with empty strings to prevent undefined values.
275-307: Well-implemented accessibility for validation feedback.Good implementation of:
- ARIA live region for dynamic content updates
- Conditional rendering based on focus state
- Clear validation criteria with real-time feedback
270-271: Consider test implications of focus/blur handlers.Based on the learnings from Cypress test failures, ensure that the test suite:
- Handles focus/blur events properly
- Accounts for validation-triggered re-renders
- Uses appropriate timeouts and assertions
Run this script to identify potential test issues:
Also applies to: 327-328
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx (1)
285-304:⚠️ Potential issueEnhance security of username validation patterns.
The regex patterns for username validation should be anchored with
^and$to prevent partial matches. This is particularly important for security-critical validation rules.Apply this diff to fix the patterns:
{ description: "username_characters_validation", - fulfilled: /^[a-z0-9._-]*$/.test(field.value), + fulfilled: /^[a-z0-9._-]*$/.test(field.value), }, { description: "username_consecutive_validation", - fulfilled: !/(?:[._-]{2,})/.test(field.value), + fulfilled: !/^.*[._-]{2,}.*$/.test(field.value), },
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx (3)
114-115: Consider using a single state object for field focus states.Instead of managing multiple boolean states, consider using a single object to manage all field focus states. This would be more scalable if more fields need focus tracking in the future.
- const [isPasswordFieldFocused, setIsPasswordFieldFocused] = useState(false); - const [isUsernameFieldFocused, setIsUsernameFieldFocused] = useState(false); + const [focusedFields, setFocusedFields] = useState({ + password: false, + username: false + });
338-357: Consider adding special character requirement to password validation.The current password validation checks for length, lowercase, uppercase, and numbers. Consider adding a special character requirement to enhance security.
Add this validation rule:
validations={[ // ... existing validations ... + { + description: "password_special_char_validation", + fulfilled: /[!@#$%^&*(),.?":{}|<>]/.test(field.value), + }, ]}
275-312: Improve accessibility of validation messages.The validation messages are using
aria-live="polite"which is good for accessibility. However, consider addingrole="status"to better convey the validation state to screen readers.- <div className="text-small mt-2 pl-2 text-secondary-500" aria-live="polite"> + <div className="text-small mt-2 pl-2 text-secondary-500" aria-live="polite" role="status">Also applies to: 333-361
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx(6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx (3)
Learnt from: AdityaJ2305
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#10054
File: src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx:278-297
Timestamp: 2025-01-19T15:10:57.217Z
Learning: When implementing Cypress tests for forms with real-time validation and focus/blur handlers, avoid typing character-by-character with click() events as it can cause multiple re-renders. Instead, type the entire string at once after ensuring the input is visible.
Learnt from: AdityaJ2305
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#10054
File: src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx:278-297
Timestamp: 2025-01-19T14:12:10.781Z
Learning: When using Cypress with React forms that have real-time validation, use `should('be.visible')` before typing and add `{ force: true }` option or break down type commands into smaller chunks with intermediate assertions to handle DOM detachment issues.
Learnt from: AdityaJ2305
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#10054
File: src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx:278-297
Timestamp: 2025-01-19T14:53:36.552Z
Learning: In Cypress tests for React forms, avoid triggering validation errors by submitting an incomplete form before filling all fields, as this can cause form re-rendering and make elements temporarily unavailable to Cypress. Instead, fill all required fields first and then submit the form.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
- GitHub Check: Redirect rules - care-ohc
- GitHub Check: Header rules - care-ohc
- GitHub Check: Pages changed - care-ohc
- GitHub Check: cypress-run (1)
- GitHub Check: OSSAR-Scan
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/Users/CreateUserForm.tsx (2)
101-106: LGTM! Form default values are properly initialized.The default values for the form fields are correctly set with empty strings, which is a good practice for controlled form components.
270-271: Consider debouncing focus/blur handlers.Given the learnings about Cypress test issues with real-time validation, consider debouncing the focus/blur handlers to prevent rapid re-renders during testing.
+import { debounce } from "lodash"; + +const debouncedSetFocus = debounce(setIsPasswordFieldFocused, 150); +const debouncedSetBlur = debounce(setIsPasswordFieldFocused, 150); <Input data-cy="password-input" placeholder={t("password")} {...field} - onFocus={() => setIsPasswordFieldFocused(true)} - onBlur={() => setIsPasswordFieldFocused(false)} + onFocus={() => debouncedSetFocus(true)} + onBlur={() => debouncedSetBlur(false)} />Also applies to: 329-330
|
👋 Hi, @AdityaJ2305, This message is automatically generated by prince-chrismc/label-merge-conflicts-action so don't hesitate to report issues/improvements there. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/components/Users/UserForm.tsx (2)
371-396: Consider extracting validation patterns to avoid duplication.The regex patterns are duplicated between the form schema and the ValidationHelper component. Consider extracting these to a shared constants file to maintain DRY principles.
+ // src/common/constants/validation.ts + export const USERNAME_VALIDATION = { + ALLOWED_CHARS: /^[a-z0-9._-]*$/, + START_END: /^[a-z0-9].*[a-z0-9]$/, + CONSECUTIVE: /(?:[._-]{2,})/, + };
Line range hint
507-520: Consider enhancing phone number validation.While the current implementation validates the format with regex, consider adding these improvements:
- Add a helper text showing the expected format
- Consider using a phone number input library for better UX
<FormField control={form.control} name="phone_number" render={({ field }) => ( <FormItem> <FormLabel required>{t("phone_number")}</FormLabel> <FormControl> <Input data-cy="phone-number-input" type="tel" placeholder="+91XXXXXXXXXX" maxLength={13} + pattern="^\+91[0-9]{10}$" {...field} /> </FormControl> + <p className="text-sm text-gray-500"> + {t("phone_number_format_help")} + </p> <FormMessage /> </FormItem> )} />Also applies to: 521-534
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
public/locale/en.json(3 hunks)src/components/Users/UserForm.tsx(7 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- public/locale/en.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: cypress-run (1)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/components/Users/UserForm.tsx (4)
3-3: LGTM! Well-structured state management for form validation.The addition of focus tracking state variables and the ValidationHelper component shows good separation of concerns and follows React best practices.
Also applies to: 31-34, 155-156
121-126: LGTM! Proper form field initialization.Initializing form fields with empty strings is a React best practice that prevents uncontrolled to controlled component warnings.
356-357: LGTM! Excellent accessibility and UX implementation.Great attention to detail with:
- Using aria-live for screen readers
- Showing validation rules only when focused
- Clear visual feedback for each validation rule
Also applies to: 361-404
421-422: LGTM! Consistent validation pattern implementation.The password validation implementation follows the same robust pattern as username validation, maintaining consistency across the form.
Also applies to: 425-453
Proposed Changes
@ohcnetwork/care-fe-code-reviewers
Merge Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
Localization
User Experience
Validation
ValidationHelpercomponent for more flexible and clear validation messaging