Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes for FAKE Xunit warning #922

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 2, 2015

Conversation

naveensrinivasan
Copy link

The FAKE build has deprecated XUnit2Helper http://fsharp.github.io/FAKE/apidocs/fake-xunit2helper.html .

This fix replaces XUnit2Helper with XUnit2
http://fsharp.github.io/FAKE/apidocs/fake-testing-xunit2.html.

Naveen added 3 commits October 2, 2015 16:14
Fixes for the FAKE warning
Fixes for the FAKE warning
@naveensrinivasan
Copy link
Author

The build fails because of #904 StopsMakingNewRequestsWhenTakeIsFulfilled

@haacked
Copy link
Contributor

haacked commented Oct 2, 2015

haacked added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2015
@haacked haacked merged commit 7f2ad11 into octokit:master Oct 2, 2015
@naveensrinivasan naveensrinivasan deleted the fixes-for-fake-warning branch October 3, 2015 00:05
@@ -88,14 +88,14 @@ Target "ConventionTests" (fun _ ->
!! (sprintf "./Octokit.Tests.Conventions/bin/%s/**/Octokit.Tests.Conventions.dll" buildMode)
|> xUnit2 (fun p ->
{p with
OutputDir = testResultsDir })
HtmlOutputPath = Some (testResultsDir @@ "xunit.html") })
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Couldn't this affect someone? It's now outputting HTML instead of XML, right?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@khellang AFAIK it wasn't used. If it affects someone, I could change it to XML.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I dunno. I thought maybe AppVeyor or someone might've picked it up. Just thought I'd ask 😄

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants