evm tokens: remove Emerald references #313
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
need to test for regressions on emerald. can't validate on sapphire yet, I don't have an sgx-capable sapphire node to test EVM calls on |
|
no regressions on emerald |
pro-wh
force-pushed
the
pro-wh/feature/rtparam2
branch
from
1261958 to
1727ff2
Compare
pro-wh
force-pushed
the
pro-wh/feature/rtparam2
branch
from
1727ff2 to
fa209fb
Compare
aefhm
approved these changes
Feb 13, 2023
Andrew7234
approved these changes
Feb 13, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
for #305
resync boilerplate with runtime analyzer.
evm tokens analyzer is now split into emerald- and sapphire-specific ones