-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add details column to Consensus transactions list #1472
Conversation
Deployed to Cloudflare Pages
|
f908397
to
cc002d4
Compare
Not ready for review. Need to talk to Don first. |
2e84e7b
to
ce95725
Compare
return ( | ||
<> | ||
<From address={transaction.sender} ownAddress={ownAddress} scope={scope} /> | ||
<LabelValue label={t('common.id')} value={transaction.body?.id} trimMobile /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This can be matched to runtime ids
Line 102 in a01b899
runtimeId: '000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000f80306c9858e7279', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes body.id is always runtime id in executor commits. Why should I match this value with a config value?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
discussed during sync meeting:
- define tx details and labels (planning meeting)
- map runtime id to a name (separate PR)
- use ValidatorLink instead AccountLink where needed
getConsensusTransactionDetails
)TODO: