Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Track history of flow ids on contacts #39

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Mar 31, 2022
Merged

Track history of flow ids on contacts #39

merged 8 commits into from
Mar 31, 2022

Conversation

rowanseymour
Copy link
Member

@rowanseymour rowanseymour commented Mar 22, 2022

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 22, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #39 (3b7469d) into main (c99c739) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 3b7469d differs from pull request most recent head bace1d5. Consider uploading reports for the commit bace1d5 to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #39   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   74.65%   74.65%           
=======================================
  Files           3        3           
  Lines         217      217           
=======================================
  Hits          162      162           
  Misses         33       33           
  Partials       22       22           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
indexers/contacts.go 77.52% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c99c739...bace1d5. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@ericnewcomer ericnewcomer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔥

@@ -153,6 +153,12 @@
"flow": {
"type": "keyword"
},
"flow_id": {
"type": "integer"
},
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

seems preferable to index a list of integers rather than UUIDs... and if we have to know about flow ids, why not switch flow over to being id based as well

@rowanseymour rowanseymour merged commit 1ad3e88 into main Mar 31, 2022
@rowanseymour rowanseymour deleted the flow_history branch March 31, 2022 16:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants