chore: update CODEOWNERS #1543
Merged
chore: update CODEOWNERS #1543
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mrossinek
approved these changes
Jul 29, 2024
|
If you would like, I wouldn't mind being added. But that's up to you. |
Sounds like a plan. Would you prefer being added for the files which you actively maintain - like the latex rendering modules etc., or for the whole project (this one's up to you, depends on how many pings you want)? You can give me a list of modules if so :) |
|
I'm fine with getting notified about everything |
|
Yup, I can be removed from codeowners right now. Life's busy and in the meantime, let's reflect reality. Still checking out the updates thought |
danymat
approved these changes
Aug 2, 2024
vhyrro
force-pushed
the
push-zxtktulznyks
branch
from
e1a1286 to
788202b
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR updates the CODEOWNERS file to reflect the current state of active maintainers. @mrossinek and I have already discussed this, he'll keep contributing but on the specification side.
@danymat, would you like to be kept for non-code things like documentation, or would you like to be removed from the CODEOWNERS file entirely? (i.e. you won't get pinged endlessly for every new PR to Neorg. You'll still remain in the nvim-neorg organization though).