Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Notes and Stuff on Relays update to README.md #202

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

swbratcher
Copy link

Likely to go unnoticed, this change is to aid branding. It is consistent with the long standing descriptor of the purpose and makeup of the protocol. If this change is noticed, it's likely to be appreciated, because it can help more clearly and succinctly convey what the protocol is.

The abbreviation still works NOSTR is made up of the following capitals: "NOtes and STuff on Relays". Still in sequence and with appropriate emphasis and meaning.

So, we still call it Nostr. We still know it's abbreviated. We still know it's a protocol with notes and stuff and relays. And we still know it's what we've always used. It's just now easier to tie to a tagline that is just as descriptive without such a long sentence. This will be helpful for newly onboarded users and for when referenced in content and media.

I'll just leave this pull request here for you. Enjoy.

(I created this once before, but fiatjaf said thanks but no thanks so I deleted it. But, I'm throwing this back out there and will leave it because I think there's merit.)

Likely to go unnoticed, a change to aid branding that is consistent with the long standing descriptor of the purpose and makeup of the protocol. If this change is noticed, it's likely to be appreciated, because it can help more clearly and succinctly convey what the protocol is. The abbreviation still works NOSTR is made up of the following capitals: "NOtes and STuff on Relays". Still in sequence and with appropriate emphasis. So we still call it Nostr. We still know it's abbreviated. We still know it's a protocol with notes and stuff and relays. And we still know it's what we've always used. It's just now easier to tie to a tagline that is just as descriptive without such a long sentence. This will be helpful for newly onboarded users and for when referenced in content and media.
@swbratcher
Copy link
Author

Regardless, of how long it's been the other way, the change is likely to aid in branding, discussion by non-nostriches, ease of introductions to new users, etc. Worth a pull, if you ask me. Not too many materials out there that'll be adversely impacted by this change. Even if uneditable materials out there refer to the old descriptor they will be accurate enough to not cause confusion. But all newer materials can take advantage of the clearer, more concise descriptor.

My npub: npub1gkgyk28lurjuhyfjlxsga9mw6lc0c47c8pmcr65usre9d3qjcx6q9cyk5m

@fiatjaf
Copy link
Member

fiatjaf commented Jan 30, 2025

Sorry, I forgot to answer, but I don't think we should change it.

Even if it's a better name.

I think you can refer to Nostr using any name or meaning you want, you don't even have to call it Nostr. This repo is just one way among others to refer to Nostr.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants