doc: update landing pr info in onboarding doc #8344
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mscdex
added
the
meta
| * `#node-dev` on freenode | ||
| * force-pushing to fix things after is allowed for ~10 minutes, be sure to notify people in IRC if you need to do this, but avoid it | ||
| * Info on PRs that don't like to apply found under [**"If `git am` fails"**](./onboarding-extras.md#if-git-am-fails). | ||
| * Force-pushing to fix things after is allowed for ~10 minutes. Avoid it if you can. Post to `#node-dev` (IRC) if you need to force push. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should we mention the --force-with-lease option here ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Last part can probably be it's own bullet?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think --force-with-lease with lease is worth mentioning and will add it.
Happy to make the last part its own sub-bullet. I don't have a strong opinion either way.
|
Nits addressed (I hope). PTAL |
| * no one (including TSC or CTC members) pushes directly to master without review | ||
| * an exception is made for release commits only | ||
| * No one (including TSC or CTC members) pushes directly to master without review. | ||
| * An exception is made for release commits only. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Or corrections to the commit log within the 10 minute window?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Technically, I suppose yes. No one has ever been confused about that, as far as I know, though. And I'd prefer to avoid introducing content that my increase cognitive load without providing valuable information. If you want to propose some language that you think would work, I'm open to it.
Reword and re-organize. Only significant content change is to specifically call out the two-CTC-member-LGTM requirement for semver-major changes.
|
Comments addressed. PTAL again. |
|
LGTM! |
|
Thanks for doing this, btw |
|
lgtm |
Trott
added a commit
to Trott/io.js
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 1, 2016
Reword and re-organize. Only significant content change is to specifically call out the two-CTC-member-LGTM requirement for semver-major changes. PR-URL: nodejs#8344 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <[email protected]>
|
Landed in 2501a38 |
Closed
Fishrock123
pushed a commit
to Fishrock123/node
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2016
Reword and re-organize. Only significant content change is to specifically call out the two-CTC-member-LGTM requirement for semver-major changes. PR-URL: nodejs#8344 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <[email protected]>
Fishrock123
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 9, 2016
Reword and re-organize. Only significant content change is to specifically call out the two-CTC-member-LGTM requirement for semver-major changes. PR-URL: #8344 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 30, 2016
Reword and re-organize. Only significant content change is to specifically call out the two-CTC-member-LGTM requirement for semver-major changes. PR-URL: #8344 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2016
Reword and re-organize. Only significant content change is to specifically call out the two-CTC-member-LGTM requirement for semver-major changes. PR-URL: #8344 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <[email protected]>
rvagg
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 18, 2016
Reword and re-organize. Only significant content change is to specifically call out the two-CTC-member-LGTM requirement for semver-major changes. PR-URL: #8344 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 26, 2016
Reword and re-organize. Only significant content change is to specifically call out the two-CTC-member-LGTM requirement for semver-major changes. PR-URL: #8344 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <[email protected]>
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist
Affected core subsystem(s)
doc
Description of change
Reword and re-organize. Only significant content change is to
specifically call out the two-CTC-member-LGTM requirement for
semver-major changes.