-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: be explicit about polluting of global
#6017
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
There was a comment in `test-domain-crypto.js` indicating that the pollution of the `global` object with a `domain` property was intentional. Provide more information in the comment so someone may easily determine why. Use `global.domain` rather than declaring `domain` without the `var` keyword to more clearly signal that the pollution is intentional.
Trott
added
crypto
Issues and PRs related to the crypto subsystem.
domain
Issues and PRs related to the domain subsystem.
test
Issues and PRs related to the tests.
lts-watch-v4.x
labels
Apr 2, 2016
Can you add a |
LGTM with the nit addressed |
LGTM |
jasnell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 4, 2016
There was a comment in `test-domain-crypto.js` indicating that the pollution of the `global` object with a `domain` property was intentional. Provide more information in the comment so someone may easily determine why. Use `global.domain` rather than declaring `domain` without the `var` keyword to more clearly signal that the pollution is intentional. PR-URL: #6017 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Landed in ae2be27 |
Trott
added a commit
to Trott/io.js
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 4, 2016
The last change to this test landed before a nit about strict mode was addressed, so this change addresses that. Refs: nodejs#6017
2 tasks
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 5, 2016
There was a comment in `test-domain-crypto.js` indicating that the pollution of the `global` object with a `domain` property was intentional. Provide more information in the comment so someone may easily determine why. Use `global.domain` rather than declaring `domain` without the `var` keyword to more clearly signal that the pollution is intentional. PR-URL: #6017 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Trott
added a commit
to Trott/io.js
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 6, 2016
The last change to this test landed before a nit about strict mode was addressed, so this change addresses that. PR-URL: nodejs#6047 Refs: nodejs#6017 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Roman Klauke <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2016
There was a comment in `test-domain-crypto.js` indicating that the pollution of the `global` object with a `domain` property was intentional. Provide more information in the comment so someone may easily determine why. Use `global.domain` rather than declaring `domain` without the `var` keyword to more clearly signal that the pollution is intentional. PR-URL: #6017 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Merged
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 19, 2016
The last change to this test landed before a nit about strict mode was addressed, so this change addresses that. PR-URL: #6047 Refs: #6017 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Roman Klauke <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 20, 2016
The last change to this test landed before a nit about strict mode was addressed, so this change addresses that. PR-URL: #6047 Refs: #6017 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Roman Klauke <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 20, 2016
The last change to this test landed before a nit about strict mode was addressed, so this change addresses that. PR-URL: #6047 Refs: #6017 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Roman Klauke <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2016
The last change to this test landed before a nit about strict mode was addressed, so this change addresses that. PR-URL: #6047 Refs: #6017 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Roman Klauke <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 18, 2016
The last change to this test landed before a nit about strict mode was addressed, so this change addresses that. PR-URL: #6047 Refs: #6017 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Roman Klauke <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull Request check-list
make -j8 test
(UNIX) orvcbuild test nosign
(Windows) pass withthis change (including linting)?
Affected core subsystem(s)
test crypto domain
Description of change
There was a comment in
test-domain-crypto.js
indicating that thepollution of the
global
object with adomain
property wasintentional. Provide more information in the comment so someone may
easily determine why. Use
global.domain
rather than declaringdomain
without the
var
keyword to more clearly signal that the pollution isintentional.