-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove unused branches from fs #4795
Conversation
LGTM if the CI is happy |
LGTM |
Any idea why the CI isn't happy? Doesn't seem related. |
Just Jenkins being Jenkins. I just got a green build though, so trying again: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/1347/ |
LGTM |
In a few places the code was refactored to use `maybeCallback` which always returns a function. Checking for `if (callback)` always returns true anyway. PR-URL: nodejs#4795 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: thefourtheye <[email protected]>
Ok, fixed commit message as far as I'm concerned this can land and it got 3 LGTMs. Thanks for the fast feedback as always :) |
Weird build bot failures happening in CI right now... just to be safe following the new commit, new CI run: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/1351/ |
@jasnell good idea. Passed. |
In a few places the code was refactored to use `maybeCallback` which always returns a function. Checking for `if (callback)` always returns true anyway. PR-URL: #4795 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: thefourtheye <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <[email protected]>
Thanks! Landed in c00d08f. @benjamingr Thanks for pre-filling the review lines! I lowercased the commit title and wrapped the message body at 72 character, for reference. 😉 |
@silverwind thanks, I totally forgot about that - been a while since I've been able to contribute a PR :) |
In a few places the code was refactored to use `maybeCallback` which always returns a function. Checking for `if (callback)` always returns true anyway. PR-URL: #4795 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: thefourtheye <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <[email protected]>
@benjamingr it looks like this PR is modifying a bunch of code paths that don't exist on v4.x-staging and thus we are getting a ton of conflicts. Would you be willing to manually backport? |
@thealphanerd sure, do I just open a pull request against the v4 branch? |
against v4.x-staging |
In a few places the code was refactored to use `maybeCallback` which always returns a function. Checking for `if (callback)` always returns true anyway. PR-URL: nodejs#4795 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: thefourtheye <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <[email protected]>
In a few places the code was refactored to use
maybeCallback
which always returns a function. Checking forif (callback)
always returns true anyway.