Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

vm: refactor to avoid unsafe array iteration #36752

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 13, 2021

Conversation

aduh95
Copy link
Contributor

@aduh95 aduh95 commented Jan 3, 2021

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@aduh95 aduh95 added vm Issues and PRs related to the vm subsystem. needs-benchmark-ci PR that need a benchmark CI run. labels Jan 3, 2021
@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor Author

aduh95 commented Jan 3, 2021

Benchmark CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js%20benchmark/job/benchmark-node-micro-benchmarks/869/ (queued, will 404 until it starts)

@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor Author

aduh95 commented Jan 3, 2021

No perf regression or improvement

                                                                    confidence improvement accuracy (*)    (**)   (***)
 vm/create-context.js n=100                                                        -1.06 %       ±8.00% ±10.65% ±13.88%
 vm/run-in-context.js withSigintListener=0 breakOnSigint=0 n=1                     -1.67 %       ±7.09%  ±9.43% ±12.27%
 vm/run-in-context.js withSigintListener=0 breakOnSigint=1 n=1                      2.73 %       ±7.58% ±10.11% ±13.21%
 vm/run-in-context.js withSigintListener=1 breakOnSigint=0 n=1                      1.23 %       ±6.48%  ±8.65% ±11.31%
 vm/run-in-context.js withSigintListener=1 breakOnSigint=1 n=1                     -2.97 %       ±4.42%  ±5.89%  ±7.66%
 vm/run-in-this-context.js withSigintListener=0 breakOnSigint=0 n=1                -2.35 %       ±5.64%  ±7.50%  ±9.77%
 vm/run-in-this-context.js withSigintListener=0 breakOnSigint=1 n=1                 5.30 %       ±6.35%  ±8.48% ±11.10%
 vm/run-in-this-context.js withSigintListener=1 breakOnSigint=0 n=1                 1.00 %       ±5.77%  ±7.69% ±10.03%
 vm/run-in-this-context.js withSigintListener=1 breakOnSigint=1 n=1                -3.33 %       ±4.76%  ±6.33%  ±8.24%

Be aware that when doing many comparisons the risk of a false-positive
result increases. In this case there are 9 comparisons, you can thus
expect the following amount of false-positive results:
  0.45 false positives, when considering a   5% risk acceptance (*, **, ***),
  0.09 false positives, when considering a   1% risk acceptance (**, ***),
  0.01 false positives, when considering a 0.1% risk acceptance (***)
++ mv output030121-121422.csv /w/bnch-comp

@aduh95 aduh95 added review wanted PRs that need reviews. and removed needs-benchmark-ci PR that need a benchmark CI run. labels Jan 3, 2021
@aduh95 aduh95 added author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. labels Jan 12, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jan 13, 2021
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

PR-URL: nodejs#36752
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor Author

aduh95 commented Jan 13, 2021

Landed in e70e793

@aduh95 aduh95 merged commit e70e793 into nodejs:master Jan 13, 2021
@aduh95 aduh95 deleted the vm-array-iteration branch January 13, 2021 14:50
ruyadorno pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2021
PR-URL: #36752
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@ruyadorno ruyadorno mentioned this pull request Jan 22, 2021
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 25, 2021
PR-URL: #36752
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 30, 2021
PR-URL: #36752
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2021
PR-URL: #36752
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2021
PR-URL: #36752
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. review wanted PRs that need reviews. vm Issues and PRs related to the vm subsystem.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants