wasi: fix serdes bugs from snapshot1 migration #31122
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
During the migration to WASI snapshot1, a field was removed from the subscription type. The field was removed from the code, but the bounds checking logic was not updated. This commit updates that check. Similarly, __wasi_linkcount_t changed from a uint32_t to a uint64_t. However, the bounds checks were missed, and the code was still writing uint32_t's (to the new correct offset) instead of uint64_t's. This commit updates that logic as well. Refs: nodejs#30980
nodejs-github-bot
added
the
c++
devnexen
approved these changes
Dec 28, 2019
addaleax
approved these changes
Dec 28, 2019
jasnell
approved these changes
Dec 28, 2019
Trott
approved these changes
Dec 29, 2019
cjihrig
added
the
author ready
|
Landed in b9f0351 |
Trott
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 31, 2019
During the migration to WASI snapshot1, a field was removed from the subscription type. The field was removed from the code, but the bounds checking logic was not updated. This commit updates that check. Similarly, __wasi_linkcount_t changed from a uint32_t to a uint64_t. However, the bounds checks were missed, and the code was still writing uint32_t's (to the new correct offset) instead of uint64_t's. This commit updates that logic as well. Refs: #30980 PR-URL: #31122 Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
BridgeAR
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2020
During the migration to WASI snapshot1, a field was removed from the subscription type. The field was removed from the code, but the bounds checking logic was not updated. This commit updates that check. Similarly, __wasi_linkcount_t changed from a uint32_t to a uint64_t. However, the bounds checks were missed, and the code was still writing uint32_t's (to the new correct offset) instead of uint64_t's. This commit updates that logic as well. Refs: #30980 PR-URL: #31122 Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Merged
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2020
During the migration to WASI snapshot1, a field was removed from the subscription type. The field was removed from the code, but the bounds checking logic was not updated. This commit updates that check. Similarly, __wasi_linkcount_t changed from a uint32_t to a uint64_t. However, the bounds checks were missed, and the code was still writing uint32_t's (to the new correct offset) instead of uint64_t's. This commit updates that logic as well. Refs: #30980 PR-URL: #31122 Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2020
During the migration to WASI snapshot1, a field was removed from the subscription type. The field was removed from the code, but the bounds checking logic was not updated. This commit updates that check. Similarly, __wasi_linkcount_t changed from a uint32_t to a uint64_t. However, the bounds checks were missed, and the code was still writing uint32_t's (to the new correct offset) instead of uint64_t's. This commit updates that logic as well. Refs: #30980 PR-URL: #31122 Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
BethGriggs
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2020
During the migration to WASI snapshot1, a field was removed from the subscription type. The field was removed from the code, but the bounds checking logic was not updated. This commit updates that check. Similarly, __wasi_linkcount_t changed from a uint32_t to a uint64_t. However, the bounds checks were missed, and the code was still writing uint32_t's (to the new correct offset) instead of uint64_t's. This commit updates that logic as well. Refs: #30980 PR-URL: #31122 Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
During the migration to WASI snapshot1, a field was removed from the subscription type. The field was removed from the code, but the bounds checking logic was not updated. This commit updates that check.
Similarly,
__wasi_linkcount_tchanged from auint32_tto auint64_t. However, the bounds checks were missed, and the code was still writinguint32_t's (to the new correct offset) instead ofuint64_t's. This commit updates that logic as well.Refs: #30980
(I've also opened nodejs/uvwasi#69 to come up with a plan to make this process a bit smoother moving forward.)
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes