Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

build: re-introduce --use-largepages as no-op #31075

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

build: re-introduce --use-largepages as no-op #31075

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

gabrielschulhof
Copy link
Contributor

Re-introduce the build-time option as a no-op in order to retain
backward compatibility for LTS purposes.

Re: #31063 (review)

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the build Issues and PRs related to build files or the CI. label Dec 24, 2019
@gabrielschulhof
Copy link
Contributor Author

The tests failed locally with

=== release test-dgram-send-cb-quelches-error ===                             
Path: parallel/test-dgram-send-cb-quelches-error
assert.js:384
    throw err;
    ^

AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: The expression evaluated to a falsy value:

  assert.ok(err)

    at callbackOnly (/home/nix/node/node/test/parallel/test-dgram-send-cb-quelches-error.js:24:10)
    at /home/nix/node/node/test/common/index.js:358:15
    at processTicksAndRejections (internal/process/task_queues.js:84:21) {
  generatedMessage: true,
  code: 'ERR_ASSERTION',
  actual: null,
  expected: true,
  operator: '=='
}
Command: out/Release/node /home/nix/node/node/test/parallel/test-dgram-send-cb-quelches-error.js

richardlau
richardlau approved these changes Dec 24, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@richardlau richardlau left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Commit title has a typo (“introducue”) but otherwise LGTM.

build: re-introduce --use-largepages as no-op
68880f4 
Re-introduce the build-time option as a no-op in order to retain
backward compatibility for LTS purposes.

Re: nodejs#31063 (review)
@gabrielschulhof gabrielschulhof changed the title build: re-introducue --use-largepages as no-op build: re-introduce --use-largepages as no-op Dec 24, 2019
@gabrielschulhof
Copy link
Contributor Author

@richardlau thanks! I fixed the commit message.

@BridgeAR BridgeAR added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Dec 24, 2019
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/27900/

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/27919/

gabrielschulhof pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 26, 2019
build: re-introduce --use-largepages as no-op
3d50001 
Re-introduce the build-time option as a no-op in order to retain
backward compatibility for LTS purposes.

Re: #31063 (review)
PR_URL: #31075
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Beth Griggs <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
@gabrielschulhof
Copy link
Contributor Author

Landed in 3d50001.

@gabrielschulhof gabrielschulhof mentioned this pull request Dec 26, 2019
Closed
4 tasks
gabrielschulhof pushed a commit to gabrielschulhof/node that referenced this pull request Dec 31, 2019
build: re-introduce --use-largepages as no-op
a06a137 
Re-introduce the build-time option as a no-op in order to retain
backward compatibility for LTS purposes.

Re: nodejs#31063 (review)
PR_URL: nodejs#31075
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Beth Griggs <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
BridgeAR pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2020
@BridgeAR
build: re-introduce --use-largepages as no-op
baf8730 
Re-introduce the build-time option as a no-op in order to retain
backward compatibility for LTS purposes.

Re: #31063 (review)
PR_URL: #31075
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Beth Griggs <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2020
@MylesBorins
build: re-introduce --use-largepages as no-op
5fcf542 
Re-introduce the build-time option as a no-op in order to retain
backward compatibility for LTS purposes.

Re: #31063 (review)
Backport-PR-URL: #31063
PR_URL: #31075
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Beth Griggs <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2020
@BethGriggs
build: re-introduce --use-largepages as no-op
332b343 
Re-introduce the build-time option as a no-op in order to retain
backward compatibility for LTS purposes.

Re: #31063 (review)
Backport-PR-URL: #31063
PR_URL: #31075
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Beth Griggs <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
@gabrielschulhof gabrielschulhof deleted the build-time-large-pages-noop branch February 21, 2020 17:35
gabrielschulhof pushed a commit to gabrielschulhof/node that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2020
build: re-introduce --use-largepages as no-op
7502e31 
Re-introduce the build-time option as a no-op in order to retain
backward compatibility for LTS purposes.

Re: nodejs#31063 (review)
PR_URL: nodejs#31075
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Beth Griggs <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
gabrielschulhof pushed a commit to gabrielschulhof/node that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2020
build: re-introduce --use-largepages as no-op
db8f1b0 
Re-introduce the build-time option as a no-op in order to retain
backward compatibility for LTS purposes.

Re: nodejs#31063 (review)
PR_URL: nodejs#31075
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Beth Griggs <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
@targos targos added backported-to-v12.x and removed author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. labels Apr 25, 2020
targos pushed a commit to targos/node that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2020
@targos
build: re-introduce --use-largepages as no-op
4d71000 
Re-introduce the build-time option as a no-op in order to retain
backward compatibility for LTS purposes.

Backport-PR-URL: nodejs#32092
Re: nodejs#31063 (review)
PR_URL: nodejs#31075
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Beth Griggs <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2020
@targos
build: re-introduce --use-largepages as no-op
0190a62 
Re-introduce the build-time option as a no-op in order to retain
backward compatibility for LTS purposes.

Backport-PR-URL: #32092
Re: #31063 (review)
PR_URL: #31075
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Beth Griggs <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@BridgeAR BridgeAR BridgeAR approved these changes

@BethGriggs BethGriggs BethGriggs approved these changes

@richardlau richardlau richardlau approved these changes

@cjihrig cjihrig cjihrig approved these changes

@addaleax addaleax addaleax approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
build Issues and PRs related to build files or the CI.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
8 participants
@gabrielschulhof @nodejs-github-bot @addaleax @cjihrig @richardlau @BethGriggs @BridgeAR @targos