-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: update WPT encoding tests and run WPT in subdirectories #27860
Conversation
Since we do not implement TextDecoderStream or TextEncoderStream.
For a directory like this: - wpt - encoding - streams - backpressure.any.js - api-basics.any.js Previously we only run `api-basics.any.js`, now we also run `backpressure.any.js` (and any tests in more deeply nested directories). This enables us to run more of WPT since not every module put their tests at the top level directory.
Using `git node wpt encoding`
Since we do not implement TextEncoder.prototype.encodeInto
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The last commit could be moved up to help future bisectors
@targos |
@joyeecheung I'd personally squash both commits |
Since we do not implement TextDecoderStream or TextEncoderStream. PR-URL: #27860 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
For a directory like this: - wpt - encoding - streams - backpressure.any.js - api-basics.any.js Previously we only run `api-basics.any.js`, now we also run `backpressure.any.js` (and any tests in more deeply nested directories). This enables us to run more of WPT since not every module put their tests at the top level directory. PR-URL: #27860 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Using `git node wpt encoding` PR-URL: #27860 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Since we do not implement TextEncoder.prototype.encodeInto PR-URL: #27860 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Since we do not implement TextDecoderStream or TextEncoderStream. PR-URL: #27860 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
For a directory like this: - wpt - encoding - streams - backpressure.any.js - api-basics.any.js Previously we only run `api-basics.any.js`, now we also run `backpressure.any.js` (and any tests in more deeply nested directories). This enables us to run more of WPT since not every module put their tests at the top level directory. PR-URL: #27860 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Using `git node wpt encoding` PR-URL: #27860 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Since we do not implement TextEncoder.prototype.encodeInto PR-URL: #27860 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
let { read, written } = new TextEncoder().encodeInto("", view); | ||
assert_equals(read, 0); | ||
assert_equals(written, 0); | ||
new MessageChannel().port1.postMessage(buffer, [buffer]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I try to finish the feature encodeInto, after I finished I tested it with the test cases, but meet the failure as followed
[FAILURE] encodeInto() and a detached output buffer
MessageChannel is not defined
ReferenceError: MessageChannel is not defined
at Test. (node/test/fixtures/wpt/encoding/encodeInto.any.js:142:3)
test: expect wpt/encoding/streams to fail
Since we do not implement TextDecoderStream or TextEncoderStream.
test: run WPT in subdirectories
For a directory like this:
Previously we only run
api-basics.any.js
, now we also runbackpressure.any.js
(and any tests in more deeply nesteddirectories). This enables us to run more of WPT since not
every module put their tests at the top level directory.
test: update wpt/encoding to 7287608f90
Using
git node wpt encoding
test: expect wpt/encoding/encodeInto.any.js to fail
Since we do not implement TextEncoder.prototype.encodeInto
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes