util: inspect() should not exceed breakLength
#26914
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Using `util.inspect()` with the `compact` option set to a number could result in output that exceeded the `breakLength` option. This change makes sure that limit is taken into account.
nodejs-github-bot
added
assert
|
@nodejs/util PTAL |
targos
approved these changes
Mar 29, 2019
BridgeAR
added
the
author ready
|
@nodejs/util PTAL |
|
Landed in e1e9f1e. |
BridgeAR
added a commit
to BridgeAR/node
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2019
Using `util.inspect()` with the `compact` option set to a number could result in output that exceeded the `breakLength` option. This change makes sure that limit is taken into account. PR-URL: nodejs#26914 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
BethGriggs
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 5, 2019
Using `util.inspect()` with the `compact` option set to a number could result in output that exceeded the `breakLength` option. This change makes sure that limit is taken into account. PR-URL: #26914 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
BethGriggs
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 9, 2019
Using `util.inspect()` with the `compact` option set to a number could result in output that exceeded the `breakLength` option. This change makes sure that limit is taken into account. PR-URL: #26914 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Beth Griggs <[email protected]>
BethGriggs
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 9, 2019
Using `util.inspect()` with the `compact` option set to a number could result in output that exceeded the `breakLength` option. This change makes sure that limit is taken into account. PR-URL: #26914 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Beth Griggs <[email protected]>
Merged
BethGriggs
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 10, 2019
Using `util.inspect()` with the `compact` option set to a number could result in output that exceeded the `breakLength` option. This change makes sure that limit is taken into account. PR-URL: #26914 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Beth Griggs <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Using
util.inspect()with thecompactoption set to a numbercould result in output that exceeded the
breakLengthoption. Thischange makes sure that limit is taken into account.
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes