-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
process: remove protection for SyncWriteStream destroy in stdio #26902
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nodejs#26691 introduced an if to protect against SyncWriteStream not using the default .destroy() mechanism. This change removes that as SyncWriteStream now use standard .destroy(). See: nodejs#26691
nodejs-github-bot
added
the
process
Issues and PRs related to the process subsystem.
label
Mar 25, 2019
bnoordhuis
approved these changes
Mar 25, 2019
BridgeAR
approved these changes
Mar 25, 2019
BridgeAR
added
dont-land-on-v6.x
author ready
PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
labels
Mar 25, 2019
jasnell
approved these changes
Mar 25, 2019
addaleax
approved these changes
Mar 25, 2019
Landed in d4eda4d |
mcollina
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 28, 2019
#26691 introduced an if to protect against SyncWriteStream not using the default .destroy() mechanism. This change removes that as SyncWriteStream now use standard .destroy(). See: #26691 PR-URL: #26902 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
BethGriggs
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 5, 2019
#26691 introduced an if to protect against SyncWriteStream not using the default .destroy() mechanism. This change removes that as SyncWriteStream now use standard .destroy(). See: #26691 PR-URL: #26902 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
This was referenced Apr 23, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready
PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
process
Issues and PRs related to the process subsystem.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#26691 introduced an if to protect
against SyncWriteStream not using the default .destroy() mechanism.
This change removes that as SyncWriteStream now use standard .destroy().
See: #26691
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes