test: Use print() function in both Python 2 and 3 #24485
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nodejs-github-bot
added
test
addaleax
approved these changes
Nov 19, 2018
cclauss
force-pushed
the
print-function
branch
from
13efdb6
to
9e15693
Compare
jasnell
approved these changes
Nov 19, 2018
richardlau
approved these changes
Nov 19, 2018
refack
approved these changes
Nov 19, 2018
refack
added
python
|
Reviewers please 👍 for fast-tracking this. It's a simple refactoring to non-code tooling. |
targos
approved these changes
Nov 19, 2018
refack
force-pushed
the
print-function
branch
from
9e15693
to
cde8270
Compare
refack
force-pushed
the
print-function
branch
from
cde8270
to
c7c711b
Compare
refack
force-pushed
the
print-function
branch
from
c7c711b
to
5f25dd1
Compare
refack
removed
the
author ready
|
For some reason GitHub thinks this was merged by Trott. |
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2018
PR-URL: #24485 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
rvagg
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 28, 2018
PR-URL: #24485 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
This was referenced Dec 7, 2018
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2019
PR-URL: #24485 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
refack
pushed a commit
to refack/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2019
PR-URL: nodejs#24485 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Merged
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2019
PR-URL: #24485 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
This was referenced Jan 29, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A subset of #23669 to simplify the review process. @refack
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes