-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: fix the arguments order in assert.strictEqual
#24416
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
gireeshpunathil
added
the
code-and-learn
Issues related to the Code-and-Learn events and PRs submitted during the events.
label
Nov 17, 2018
oyyd
approved these changes
Nov 17, 2018
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Change LGTM.
Commit message should say "fix" instead of "fixed"
👍 to fast-track |
targos
approved these changes
Nov 17, 2018
gireeshpunathil
approved these changes
Nov 18, 2018
trivikr
approved these changes
Nov 18, 2018
cjihrig
approved these changes
Nov 18, 2018
jarthana
changed the title
test: fixed the arguments order in
test: fix the arguments order in Nov 19, 2018
assert.strictEqual
assert.strictEqual
jarthana
force-pushed
the
fixStrictEquals
branch
from
November 19, 2018 06:40
5535607
to
f575ca4
Compare
sagirk
approved these changes
Nov 19, 2018
gireeshpunathil
added
the
author ready
PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
label
Nov 19, 2018
all clean. Wait for either one more fast-track 👍 or 72 hours whichever comes first. |
jasnell
approved these changes
Nov 19, 2018
Trott
pushed a commit
to Trott/io.js
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2018
PR-URL: nodejs#24416 Reviewed-By: Ouyang Yadong <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Landed in 092ab7a |
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2018
PR-URL: #24416 Reviewed-By: Ouyang Yadong <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
rvagg
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 28, 2018
PR-URL: #24416 Reviewed-By: Ouyang Yadong <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
This was referenced Dec 7, 2018
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2019
PR-URL: #24416 Reviewed-By: Ouyang Yadong <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
refack
pushed a commit
to refack/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2019
PR-URL: nodejs#24416 Reviewed-By: Ouyang Yadong <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Merged
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2019
PR-URL: #24416 Reviewed-By: Ouyang Yadong <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
This was referenced Jan 29, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready
PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
code-and-learn
Issues related to the Code-and-Learn events and PRs submitted during the events.
fast-track
PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land.
test
Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes