Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: move common.fires() to inspector-helper #17401

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

Trott
Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott commented Nov 30, 2017

common.fires() is specific to the inspector tests so move it to
inspector-helper.js. The one REPL test that used common.fires() does not
seem to need it. It provided a 1 second timeout for operations, but that
timeout appears both arbitrary and ineffective as the test passes if it
is reduced to even 1 millisecond.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

test

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Nov 30, 2017
Copy link
Contributor

@maclover7 maclover7 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

function timeoutPromise(error, timeoutMs) {
let clearCallback = null;
let done = false;
const promise = onResolvedOrRejected(new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, this code for timeoutPromise is a little convoluted IMO - any reason we can't do.

const promisify = require('util').promisify;
const delay = promisify(setTimeout);
const timeoutPromise = async (error, timeoutMs, cancelToken) => {
  await delay(ms);
  if(cancelToken.cancelled) { 
    return;
  }
  throw error;
};

Turns fires to:

function fires(promise, error, timeoutMs) {
  var token = {};
  return Promise.race([
     onResolvedOrRejected(promise, () => token.cancelled = true),
     timeoutPromise(error, timeoutMs, token)
   ]);
 }

If we want to preserve the onResolvedOnRejected behavior (which I'm not sure I understand) we can just use Promise.prototype.finally which is in V8 6.3

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No issues with further refactoring, but I'd prefer to do that in a separate PR.

Copy link
Member

@benjamingr benjamingr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Current code is a little complex IMO but actual changes LGTM

@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Dec 1, 2017

common.fires() is specific to the inspector tests so move it to
inspector-helper.js. The one REPL test that used common.fires() does not
seem to need it. It provided a 1 second timeout for operations, but that
timeout appears both arbitrary and ineffective as the test passes if it
is reduced to even 1 millisecond.
Trott added a commit to Trott/io.js that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2017
common.fires() is specific to the inspector tests so move it to
inspector-helper.js. The one REPL test that used common.fires() does not
seem to need it. It provided a 1 second timeout for operations, but that
timeout appears both arbitrary and ineffective as the test passes if it
is reduced to even 1 millisecond.

PR-URL: nodejs#17401
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Dec 4, 2017

Landed in e1054ab

@benjamingr Would you be willing/interested to file a PR for the further refactoring you suggested? I'm happy to do it, but it seems right in your wheelhouse. (Alternatively, maybe you want to stash this one away for your next Code-and-Learn event?)

@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

This does not land cleanly on v9.x

Could you please backport!

Trott added a commit to Trott/io.js that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2018
common.fires() is specific to the inspector tests so move it to
inspector-helper.js. The one REPL test that used common.fires() does not
seem to need it. It provided a 1 second timeout for operations, but that
timeout appears both arbitrary and ineffective as the test passes if it
is reduced to even 1 millisecond.

PR-URL: nodejs#17401
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Jan 11, 2018

Backported in #18096

evanlucas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2018
common.fires() is specific to the inspector tests so move it to
inspector-helper.js. The one REPL test that used common.fires() does not
seem to need it. It provided a 1 second timeout for operations, but that
timeout appears both arbitrary and ineffective as the test passes if it
is reduced to even 1 millisecond.

Backport-PR-URL: #18096
PR-URL: #17401
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2018
common.fires() is specific to the inspector tests so move it to
inspector-helper.js. The one REPL test that used common.fires() does not
seem to need it. It provided a 1 second timeout for operations, but that
timeout appears both arbitrary and ineffective as the test passes if it
is reduced to even 1 millisecond.

Backport-PR-URL: #18096
PR-URL: #17401
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
@Trott Trott deleted the fires branch January 13, 2022 22:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants