-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
timers: cleanup extraneous property on Immediates #16355
Conversation
This was originally changed in 6f75b66 but it appears unnecessary and benhcmark results show little difference without the extra property. Refs: nodejs#6436
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
SGTM
There are more instances of |
That private API has been there since the beginning of time. (Also it mirrors |
I see what you did there. |
Fixed the message test. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was still going to rebase and merge myself, but I guess I won't complain about a rebase done for me.
CTC (at the time) already voted that the predecessor could land, fwiw.
Question: since this is |
Just FYI... Next 9.0.0 RC will be generated on monday afternoon PDT. After that, I really don't want to land any more majors in 9.0.0. |
See previous comments, the same property already has existed since 0.1.x, this just removes a recently added duplicate property. |
Landed in 839faae |
This was originally changed in 6f75b66 but it appears unnecessary and benhcmark results show little difference without the extra property. Refs: #6436 PR-URL: #16355 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
This was originally changed in 6f75b66 but it appears unnecessary and benhcmark results show little difference without the extra property. Refs: nodejs/node#6436 PR-URL: nodejs/node#16355 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
This was originally changed in 6f75b66 but it appears unnecessary and benhcmark results show little difference without the extra property. Refs: nodejs/node#6436 PR-URL: nodejs/node#16355 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
Continuation of #10205
I'd like to have this in 9.0.0.
/cc @nodejs/tsc @Fishrock123