-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Graduate WHATWG Streams from Experimental? #40950
Comments
I would add #39316 as well. |
I don't think they've seen enough usage and adoption and I'd like us to be able to change them before we do. I don't think there is rush to graduate them yet (is there?), I suspect once the community uses them more we'll uncover issues that might require breaking changes (in errors or API guarantees) and I believe that graduating them doesn't get us much and costs us the ability to make changes without long deprecation cycles. |
How do we make this happen? i.e. more people uses them. |
@ronag I think we just wait and also ship other experimental APIs that use them? We can also reach out to the community and explicitly ask for feedback |
I think we could just drop the console warning on them and keep them as experimental in the docs (the same is true for Blob, File, etc..). |
The API is still experimental, but the warning isn't necessary any longer Signed-off-by: James M Snell <[email protected]> PR-URL: #40971 Refs: #40950 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Robert Nagy <[email protected]>
The API is still experimental, but the warning isn't necessary any longer Signed-off-by: James M Snell <[email protected]> PR-URL: #40971 Refs: #40950 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Robert Nagy <[email protected]>
The API is still experimental, but the warning isn't necessary any longer Signed-off-by: James M Snell <[email protected]> PR-URL: #40971 Refs: #40950 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Robert Nagy <[email protected]>
The API is still experimental, but the warning isn't necessary any longer Signed-off-by: James M Snell <[email protected]> PR-URL: #40971 Refs: #40950 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Robert Nagy <[email protected]>
The API is still experimental, but the warning isn't necessary any longer Signed-off-by: James M Snell <[email protected]> PR-URL: nodejs#40971 Refs: nodejs#40950 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Robert Nagy <[email protected]>
The API is still experimental, but the warning isn't necessary any longer Signed-off-by: James M Snell <[email protected]> PR-URL: #40971 Refs: #40950 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Robert Nagy <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #42225 Fixes: #40950 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Mestery <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <[email protected]>
PR-URL: nodejs#42225 Fixes: nodejs#40950 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Mestery <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <[email protected]>
What else do we need to make sure gets done before graduating the WHATWG streams implementation from experimental?
/cc @nodejs/streams
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: