Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 22, 2023. It is now read-only.

0.12.3 on Windows XP give not valid win32 application error #25348

Closed
deliverymanager opened this issue May 18, 2015 · 14 comments
Closed

0.12.3 on Windows XP give not valid win32 application error #25348

deliverymanager opened this issue May 18, 2015 · 14 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@deliverymanager
Copy link

I tested on a Windows XP platform.
a) 0.10.33 works fine.
b) 0.12.2 works fine
c) 0.12.3 after installing without a problem, I try to open the Node.exe and it gives me an error "node.exe is not a valid win32 application"

I have also tested the same win32 x86 0.12.3 version on a windows 7 platform and it works fine.
So, probably, this is related to a windows XP problem.

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented May 18, 2015

duplicate of #25347

@misterdjules
Copy link

@orangemocha Do you have some time to investigate?

@orangemocha orangemocha reopened this May 19, 2015
@orangemocha
Copy link
Contributor

Not a dupe of #25347, as that one was reported on Windows 7, and this issue is specific to Windows XP.

Most likely would need to backport nodejs/node@e8d0850

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented May 19, 2015

@orangemocha ah... ok.. missed that distinction entirely.

@JimHolloman
Copy link

I have the same issue on XP, 32-bit. Both the installation (.msi) package and the stand-alone node.exe file (I downloaded both) provide the message "node.exe is not a valid win32 application". The npm provides the same error with the program name changed to npm.exe.

I wonder if someone packaged the 64-bit code as a 32-bit install (.msi) and stand-alone program (node.exe).

Looking forward to getting a copy that will run on Windows XP, 32-bit. I can provide testing once an update is available.

@orangemocha
Copy link
Contributor

Ok, the problem is the gyp/project files don't explicitly specify a subsystem version, which results in the default being used. The default changed from VS 2010 to VS 2012 and later. So this means that one of the release machines still has VS 2010. (@misterdjules we should probably fix that or at least try to document it in an asset sheet). nodejs/node@e8d0850 fixes the issue. Opening a PR shortly.

orangemocha referenced this issue in nodejs/node May 22, 2015
Chrome still runs on Windows XP, so there is no reason that iojs
couldn't.

PR: #512
Reviewed-by: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
@orangemocha
Copy link
Contributor

Had a chat with @misterdjules and he told me that the release machines have both VS 2010 and 2013. So the change that probably introduced the regression is a58b174, where we select a different toolset version.
Since that change is not in v0.10, the v0.10 release still works on XP. I will cherry pick #25367 into v0.10 later.

piscisaureus added a commit that referenced this issue May 22, 2015
Issue: #25348
The gyp/project files don't explicitly specify a subsystem version,
which results in the default being used. The default changed from
VS 2010 to VS 2012 and later.

Backport e8d0850 from io.js.
Original commit message follows:

Chrome still runs on Windows XP, so there is no reason that iojs
couldn't.

PR: nodejs/node#512
(cherry picked from commit e8d0850)

Reviewed-By: Julien Gilli <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #25367
@misterdjules
Copy link

Fixed by 3122052. This fix will be included in the upcoming v0.12.4 release. Thank you!

@misterdjules
Copy link

@orangemocha @deliverymanager @JimHolloman There's a new candidate release with the fix for this issue here: http://nodejs.org/dist/v0.12.4/. Could you please try to install this version on Windows XP and let us know if it solves your problem? Thank you!

@deliverymanager
Copy link
Author

Yes I can confirm that in 0.12.4 the bug is resolved.
It is working fine.

@misterdjules
Copy link

@deliverymanager Thank you! In the meantime I was also able to setup a Windows XP VM, and I also verified that the new binaries/installers work on XP.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 23, 2015

Gentlemen, Though I do run Win 7 for fat apps sing VS 2013, my web work is done in Win XP. Thank you so much for resolving this Win XP issue; it allows many of us to continue using more modern versions of node.

@misterdjules
Copy link

@appopen Thank you for the support! 👍

misterdjules pushed a commit to misterdjules/node that referenced this issue Jun 19, 2015
Issue: nodejs#25348
The gyp/project files don't explicitly specify a subsystem version,
which results in the default being used. The default changed from
VS 2010 to VS 2012 and later.

Backport 3122052, which itself
backports e8d0850 from io.js.
Original commit message follows:

Chrome still runs on Windows XP, so there is no reason that iojs
couldn't.

PR: nodejs/node#512
(cherry picked from commit e8d0850)

Reviewed-By: Julien Gilli <[email protected]>
PR-URL: nodejs#25367

Conflicts:
	node.gyp
misterdjules pushed a commit to misterdjules/node that referenced this issue Jun 24, 2015
Issue: nodejs#25348
The gyp/project files don't explicitly specify a subsystem version,
which results in the default being used. The default changed from
VS 2010 to VS 2012 and later.

Backport 3122052, which itself
backports e8d0850 from io.js.
Original commit message follows:

Chrome still runs on Windows XP, so there is no reason that iojs
couldn't.

PR: nodejs/node#512
(cherry picked from commit e8d0850)

Reviewed-By: Julien Gilli <[email protected]>
PR-URL: nodejs#25367

Conflicts:
	node.gyp
misterdjules pushed a commit to misterdjules/node that referenced this issue Jun 24, 2015
Issue: nodejs#25348
The gyp/project files don't explicitly specify a subsystem version,
which results in the default being used. The default changed from
VS 2010 to VS 2012 and later.

Backport 3122052, which itself
backports e8d0850 from io.js.
Original commit message follows:

  Chrome still runs on Windows XP, so there is no reason that iojs
  couldn't.

  PR: nodejs/node#512
  (cherry picked from commit e8d0850)

  Reviewed-By: Julien Gilli <[email protected]>
  PR-URL: nodejs#25367

Conflicts:
	node.gyp
misterdjules pushed a commit to misterdjules/node that referenced this issue Jul 21, 2015
Issue: nodejs#25348
The gyp/project files don't explicitly specify a subsystem version,
which results in the default being used. The default changed from
VS 2010 to VS 2012 and later.

Backport 3122052, which itself
backports e8d0850 from io.js.
Original commit message follows:

  Chrome still runs on Windows XP, so there is no reason that iojs
  couldn't.

  PR: nodejs/node#512
  (cherry picked from commit e8d0850)

  Reviewed-By: Julien Gilli <[email protected]>
  PR-URL: nodejs#25367

Conflicts:
	node.gyp
misterdjules pushed a commit to misterdjules/node that referenced this issue Jul 23, 2015
Issue: nodejs#25348
The gyp/project files don't explicitly specify a subsystem version,
which results in the default being used. The default changed from
VS 2010 to VS 2012 and later.

Backport 3122052, which itself
backports e8d0850 from io.js.
Original commit message follows:

  Chrome still runs on Windows XP, so there is no reason that iojs
  couldn't.

  PR: nodejs/node#512
  (cherry picked from commit e8d0850)

  Reviewed-By: Julien Gilli <[email protected]>
  PR-URL: nodejs#25367

Conflicts:
	node.gyp
misterdjules pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 23, 2015
Issue: #25348
The gyp/project files don't explicitly specify a subsystem version,
which results in the default being used. The default changed from
VS 2010 to VS 2012 and later.

Backport 3122052, which itself
backports e8d0850 from io.js.
Original commit message follows:

  Chrome still runs on Windows XP, so there is no reason that iojs
  couldn't.

  PR: nodejs/node#512
  (cherry picked from commit e8d0850)

  Reviewed-By: Julien Gilli <[email protected]>
  PR-URL: #25367

Conflicts:
	node.gyp

Reviewed-By: João Reis <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #25569
@Dineshkumar2401
Copy link

windowsXP32bit install to odoo9 lessc cmd problem to soluction to install lessc plugins using cmd panel ref to url:http://lesscss.org/usage/#developing-less problem all solved.....

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants