doc: remove confusing wording regarding NAN

[targos]

Use "Active LTS" instead.

Fixes: #147

[richardlau]

We already use "active" as separate from "maintenance".

[targos]

@richardlau yes, and that's what it is about here.

[richardlau]

We would expect the abstraction layer to also support maintenance releases.

[richardlau]

Based on #359 maybe use "supported" instead?

[targos]

But the next sentence says a maximum of 2 LTS releases. If maintenance was included it would be 3.

[richardlau]

Hmm. You're right but I'd certainly be very surprised if I was using maintenance LTS and nan dropped support for it before it went EOL.

[MylesBorins]

I think that this is a mistake... I do not believe that nan plans to remove support for a version of node that is supported by node

/cc @nodejs/n-api

[targos]

I thought about it... My conclusion is that we can remove this section. NAN is out of the scope of the Release WG.

[targos]

/cc @nodejs/release

[MylesBorins]

LGTM

[MylesBorins]

I've updated the title to better reflect the content. Landing