-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 681
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: remove gently hijack and tests #539
Conversation
Hm..looks like a test is failing on travis with node13
|
This pull request fixes 1 alert when merging ddb2577 into b04b5ac - view on LGTM.com fixed alerts:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great. Thanks for the PR!
I would rather somehow ignore the run of test/legacy
tests or easiest way probably is to move to test-legacy
in the root just in case for backup.
I'm still not sure what's test/legacy
is for, but may have some interesting cases for future.
@kedarv, known issue. You can remove it from Travis, otherwise I will anyway. ;D |
Cool, removed Node 13 from |
This pull request fixes 1 alert when merging ba791ef into b04b5ac - view on LGTM.com fixed alerts:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great! :) One more thing. Move test/legacy/common.js
too.
I ended up moving all of the |
This pull request fixes 1 alert when merging 0137389 into b04b5ac - view on LGTM.com fixed alerts:
|
That's why we just move the whole The reason for move is to not run these tests at all. |
This pull request fixes 1 alert when merging 499eba7 into b04b5ac - view on LGTM.com fixed alerts:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cool!
@all-contributors please add @kedarv for code and test |
I've put up a pull request to add @kedarv! 🎉 |
@all-contributors please add @kedarv for bug |
I've put up a pull request to add @kedarv! 🎉 |
Could this pr also be merged into the 1.x branch? |
I didn't want to touch v1 and that's why we published v1.2.2 with just a readme update. Any reason to not use/try v2 canary? When v2 moves to |
Yeah, I'm considering moving. But the issue #635 (comment) here makes me wonder if there will be a stable v2. Also not so sure about the breaking changes. The changelog currently is not clearly structured. I guess I'll wait for a stable v2 then. Hope there is a roadmap and release plan about this repo. |
The v2 basically is clearing the whole issue tracker, PRs and modernizing the codebase, without some huge breaking changes - it's major bump for safety. The only breaking I can think of is the exports, yet we still have the fallbacks in canary. I'm gearing up for an active year and hope to release v3 too. Roadmap and predictable release plan is understandable though, and coming. |
This pull request removes references to gently, and deletes some old tests that required gently. This should fix #337