Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Kaw v0.13.0 #699

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 26, 2021
Merged

Kaw v0.13.0 #699

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 26, 2021

Conversation

qinqon
Copy link
Member

@qinqon qinqon commented Feb 23, 2021

Is this a BUG FIX or a FEATURE ?:

Uncomment only one, leave it on its own line:

/kind bug
/kind enhancement

What this PR does / why we need it:
The certificate overlap mechanism is implemented like renewBefore from
cert-manager.

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

Bump kaw to v0.13.0 overlap is implemented like renewBefore

The certificate overlap mechanism is implemented like renewBefore from
cert-manager.

Signed-off-by: Quique Llorente <[email protected]>
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. size/XXL labels Feb 23, 2021
@qinqon qinqon requested a review from rhrazdil February 23, 2021 13:48
@qinqon qinqon requested review from phoracek and removed request for AlonaKaplan and oshoval February 23, 2021 13:48
@qinqon
Copy link
Member Author

qinqon commented Feb 24, 2021

/retest

The kube-admission-webhook v0.13.0 use CertOverlapInterval as the moment
when certificates has to start to rotate before the current certificate
expiration time, this change reduce CertOverlapInterval and CARotateInterval
to take that into account.

Signed-off-by: Quique Llorente <[email protected]>
@rhrazdil
Copy link
Collaborator

/lgtm

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 24, 2021
@qinqon
Copy link
Member Author

qinqon commented Feb 24, 2021

/retest

1 similar comment
@qinqon
Copy link
Member Author

qinqon commented Feb 24, 2021

/retest

Copy link
Member

@phoracek phoracek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: phoracek

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 25, 2021
@qinqon
Copy link
Member Author

qinqon commented Feb 26, 2021

/retest

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

kubevirt-bot commented Feb 26, 2021

@qinqon: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
pull-kubernetes-nmstate-e2e-handler-k8s-future eca2f72 link /test pull-kubernetes-nmstate-e2e-handler-k8s-future

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot merged commit 66b9357 into nmstate:master Feb 26, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XXL
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants