Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add MS_LAZYTIME flag #1437

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 31, 2021
Merged

Add MS_LAZYTIME flag #1437

merged 1 commit into from
May 31, 2021

Conversation

ManaSugi
Copy link
Contributor

MS_LAZYTIME (since Linux 4.0) reduces on-disk updates of inode
timestamps (atime, mtime, ctime) by maintaining these changes only in memory.

MS_LAZYTIME is available from libc v0.2.95.

Signed-off-by: Manabu Sugimoto [email protected]

@asomers
Copy link
Member

asomers commented May 30, 2021

Looks good, but how about a CHANGELOG entry?

@ManaSugi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry, I updated the CHANGELOG entry. Thanks.

Copy link
Member

@asomers asomers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

bors r+

@asomers
Copy link
Member

asomers commented May 31, 2021

Actually @ManaSugi you need to rebase again due to a conflict in the CHANGELOG file.

bors r-

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented May 31, 2021

Canceled.

MS_LAZYTIME (since Linux 4.0) reduces on-disk updates of inode
timestamps (atime, mtime, ctime) by maintaining these changes only in memory.

Signed-off-by: Manabu Sugimoto <[email protected]>
@ManaSugi
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm sorry, rebased again.

Copy link
Member

@asomers asomers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

bors r+

@bors bors bot merged commit a55dd45 into nix-rust:master May 31, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants