Ignore errors from Refresh Modules calls
#215
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Bleep bloop! LabVIEW Diff Robot here with some diffs served up hot for your pull request. Notice something funny? Help fix me on my GitHub repo. SEECD Engine.lvlib--Get Master and Local Mod IOVs.vi.png
SEECD System Explorer.lvlib--Host - Refresh All.vi.png
|
rtzoeller
approved these changes
Aug 23, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this Pull Request accomplish?
Ignore errors from
Refresh Modulescalls by defaultWhy should this Pull Request be merged?
With some third-party EtherCAT devices' ESI files on disk and connected to the RT target, the RT VI
Refresh Modulesreturns an error. This prevents both Auto-Detect and deployment from succeeding, even though the variables were successfully returned from the target.This should be a relatively harmless change, and it enables at least one particular EtherCAT device to successfully detect and deploy.
What testing has been done?
Hand-testing with VeriStand 2020 R6 using the 21.5 RT feed