-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 824
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Complete support for dynamic container names #231
Merged
Merged
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's no need for
=true
. Just a plain label is enough. It doesn't have to be a key-value pair.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually there is, because it defaults to an empty string and I kept the logic from #181 where it checks for the value "true":
jq -r '.[] | select( .Labels["'$1'"] == "true")|.Id'
We would have to change this query, I'm not opposed to it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually I think it's better to disregard the value, since it doesn't matter:
jq -r '.[] | select( .Labels["'$1'"])|.Id'
👍There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, it's incredibly inefficient to fetch the list of all containers. The Docker Engine API allows filtering by labels.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll look into that!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we can do that in another PR.
For reference, this is my modified version of the
docker_api
function: https://github.com/tripviss/tripviss-nginx-proxy/blob/0028116697aef28e9e7d5fec98fc791194e98e2b/docker/letsencrypt-companion/functions.sh#L31-L59Usage example: https://github.com/tripviss/tripviss-nginx-proxy/blob/0028116697aef28e9e7d5fec98fc791194e98e2b/docker/letsencrypt-companion/functions.sh#L96-L97
(really should get my changes merged upstream lol)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's better for performance but also makes it easier to filter by simply a label or label=value.
I improved my docker-label-sighup, based on this.
It's cooler now, because it allows me to do this:
-notify "docker-label-sighup com.docker.swarm.service.name=frontend_nginx"
So I can reuse the labels that already exist.