-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cellranger vdj #289
Cellranger vdj #289
Conversation
Python linting (
|
The implementation looks great 🚀 , and sorry it has taken me so long to review! There's a couple of things that make the workflow fail like the samplesheet validation, that I can also help with fixing |
We should add tests as well, if the cellranger VDJ nf-core module has test data, then maybe this one is already sufficient |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just got some comments
Co-authored-by: Gisela Gabernet <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Gisela Gabernet <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Gisela Gabernet <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Gisela Gabernet <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Gisela Gabernet <[email protected]>
|
I implemented the changes and am working on making the tests run now. Maybe you can make more out of the error and point me towards where things go wrong? ERROR ~ Error executing process > 'NFCORE_AIRRFLOW:AIRRFLOW:CLONAL_ANALYSIS:DEFINE_CLONES_COMPUTE (Patient2)'
'))" >> versions.yml |
I see these tests that are failing are running the Immcantation container, we use this for some internal checks, but don't worry if they fail. I tried to make them optional, let's see if that worked |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me! Just had one comment left
I finally found time to add the docs. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me! I just had some minor comments on the docs organization. The prettier tests are also failing, but if you don't know how to fix them I'll do it in the next PR
Co-authored-by: Gisela Gabernet <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Gisela Gabernet <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Gisela Gabernet <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Gisela Gabernet <[email protected]>
we'll do a template update on the next PR :) |
Hi :),
I added a new subworkflow that supports raw input from single-cell seq.
Currently, it only works for 10X genomics data but I plan to add more kits of course.
To do so, I added a new
--library_generation method
and a parameter to add the required reference.I will also figure out whether the reference can be added to igenomes.
Also, I would like to add the
cellranger_mkvdjref
module as well, so that users can generate their own references.I didnt yet test if the branch alters the results of the bulk workflow (what it shouldnt because it runs completely agnostic to it), but it would be great if you could use your dev dataset to test this or if you could quickly guide me to a suitable test dataset.
It would be awesome to get a review on the status of integration of the new "subway-line" of single-cell raw data analyis and to start a discussion on integrating this tools into the pipeline.
PR checklist
nf-core lint
).nextflow run . -profile test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>
).docs/usage.md
is updated.docs/output.md
is updated.CHANGELOG.md
is updated.README.md
is updated (including new tool citations and authors/contributors).