Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify Readme on bind volumes to avoid apps / custom_apps mishaps #2315

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 24, 2024

Conversation

tzerber
Copy link
Contributor

@tzerber tzerber commented Oct 17, 2024

Related to #2303

Added two examples, renamed the apps to custom_apps and added a note on mixing the apps and custom apps folder. I might put some comments in the examples folder too, if needed.

Signed-off-by: Kaloyan Nikolov <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@joshtrichards joshtrichards left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a minor suggestion. And also, a possible alternative to even my suggestion that is tempting so I'll mention it to get your thoughts on it: we drop mention of apps/ entirely. ;-)

My thinking is that in the image we can essentially treat it 100% as a shipped component, and therefore just part of the installation. I see zero reason to ever include or suggest anyone place it on a separate volume (at least no more reason than to suggest they do so with any other arbitrary folder in /var/www/html that comes from Server directly).

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@joshtrichards joshtrichards linked an issue Oct 21, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@joshtrichards joshtrichards added this to the Nextcloud 30.0.2 milestone Oct 21, 2024
@joshtrichards joshtrichards requested a review from J0WI October 21, 2024 22:15
@joshtrichards joshtrichards changed the title Clarify Readme on bind volumes Clarify Readme on bind volumes to avoid apps / custom_apps mishaps Oct 21, 2024
@tzerber
Copy link
Contributor Author

tzerber commented Oct 21, 2024 via email

Co-authored-by: Josh <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kaloyan Nikolov <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@J0WI J0WI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 for the updated example but IMHO the "more detailed" example is not needed.

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@joshtrichards joshtrichards self-assigned this Nov 15, 2024
@joshtrichards
Copy link
Member

I tend to agree on the "more detailed" stuff (i.e. using --mount) but I'm going to merge it with it for now. We can always streamline further later. Don't think it hurts anything.

@joshtrichards joshtrichards merged commit b8b4dd8 into nextcloud:master Nov 24, 2024
1 check passed
@joshtrichards
Copy link
Member

Off topic below, might open a discussion somewhere:

Certainly feel free to create an issue to discuss these unrelated items further and/or see if there's an existing relevant one to add to the discussion in.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Clarify Additional Volumes section of the docs
3 participants