Add additional exception case to catch ConnectionPoolTimeoutException… #637
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… exception and reconnect RPMService #256
twcrone
approved these changes
Jan 10, 2022
jasonjkeller
approved these changes
Jan 10, 2022
newrelic-agent/src/main/java/com/newrelic/agent/RPMService.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Jason Keller <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Overview
Handle possible Null Pointer Exception during exception handling in the RPMService. Found while investigation issues with
ConnectionPoolTimeoutExceptionRelated Github Issue
Include a link to the related GitHub issue, if applicable
Testing
Running metrics threw agent. Log line debugging.
Checks
[X] Are your contributions backwards compatible with relevant frameworks and APIs? Yes
[X] Does your code contain any breaking changes? Please describe. No
[X] Does your code introduce any new dependencies? Please describe. No