Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reactor module readme update #2260

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 6, 2025
Merged

Reactor module readme update #2260

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 6, 2025

Conversation

meiao
Copy link
Contributor

@meiao meiao commented Mar 6, 2025

Overview

Some clarification on the reactor-3.3.0 module. Why it is the way it is and when it should be loaded.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 6, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 70.62%. Comparing base (074363b) to head (a517054).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #2260   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     70.61%   70.62%           
+ Complexity    10020    10019    -1     
=========================================
  Files           844      844           
  Lines         40507    40507           
  Branches       6140     6140           
=========================================
+ Hits          28605    28608    +3     
+ Misses         9122     9120    -2     
+ Partials       2780     2779    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@meiao meiao merged commit 7044779 into main Mar 6, 2025
111 checks passed
@meiao meiao deleted the reactor-clarification branch March 6, 2025 19:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Code Complete/Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants